Arc A550M vs GeForce RTX 2070 Super

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Arc A550M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2070 Super
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 215 Watt
47.38
+93%

RTX 2070 Super outperforms Arc A550M by an impressive 93% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking69227
Place by popularity98not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation41.14no data
Power efficiency15.1728.16
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTU104DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date9 July 2019 (5 years ago)2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602048
Core clock speed1605 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)215 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate283.2262.4
Floating-point processing power9.062 TFLOPS8.397 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs160128
Tensor Cores320256
Ray Tracing Cores4016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2070 Super 47.38
+93%
Arc A550M 24.55

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2070 Super 24640
+71.7%
Arc A550M 14350

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD134
+106%
65−70
−106%
1440p79
+97.5%
40−45
−97.5%
4K51
+113%
24−27
−113%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.72no data
1440p6.32no data
4K9.78no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 117
+160%
45−50
−160%
Cyberpunk 2077 94
+88%
50−55
−88%
Elden Ring 137
+71.3%
80−85
−71.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 98
+30.7%
75−80
−30.7%
Counter-Strike 2 96
+113%
45−50
−113%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+72%
50−55
−72%
Forza Horizon 4 252
+136%
100−110
−136%
Metro Exodus 112
+75%
60−65
−75%
Red Dead Redemption 2 122
+126%
50−55
−126%
Valorant 214
+116%
95−100
−116%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 180
+140%
75−80
−140%
Counter-Strike 2 84
+86.7%
45−50
−86.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 76
+52%
50−55
−52%
Dota 2 142
+67.1%
85−90
−67.1%
Elden Ring 156
+95%
80−85
−95%
Far Cry 5 92
+21.1%
75−80
−21.1%
Fortnite 168
+35.5%
120−130
−35.5%
Forza Horizon 4 198
+85%
100−110
−85%
Grand Theft Auto V 145
+72.6%
80−85
−72.6%
Metro Exodus 89
+39.1%
60−65
−39.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 249
+60.6%
150−160
−60.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 67
+24.1%
50−55
−24.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+118%
75−80
−118%
Valorant 128
+29.3%
95−100
−29.3%
World of Tanks 270−280
+9%
250−260
−9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85
+13.3%
75−80
−13.3%
Counter-Strike 2 78
+73.3%
45−50
−73.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 69
+38%
50−55
−38%
Dota 2 129
+51.8%
85−90
−51.8%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+39.5%
75−80
−39.5%
Forza Horizon 4 167
+56.1%
100−110
−56.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 143
−8.4%
150−160
+8.4%
Valorant 194
+96%
95−100
−96%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 95
+132%
40−45
−132%
Elden Ring 92
+114%
40−45
−114%
Grand Theft Auto V 95
+132%
40−45
−132%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 44
+91.3%
21−24
−91.3%
World of Tanks 300−350
+84.7%
160−170
−84.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 83
+69.4%
45−50
−69.4%
Counter-Strike 2 51
+143%
21−24
−143%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+114%
21−24
−114%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+111%
70−75
−111%
Forza Horizon 4 123
+89.2%
65−70
−89.2%
Metro Exodus 91
+62.5%
55−60
−62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+147%
35−40
−147%
Valorant 138
+109%
65−70
−109%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 28
+27.3%
21−24
−27.3%
Dota 2 93
+116%
40−45
−116%
Elden Ring 47
+147%
18−20
−147%
Grand Theft Auto V 93
+116%
40−45
−116%
Metro Exodus 37
+94.7%
18−20
−94.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 164
+119%
75−80
−119%
Red Dead Redemption 2 28
+86.7%
14−16
−86.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 93
+121%
40−45
−121%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 57
+119%
24−27
−119%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+136%
21−24
−136%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+175%
8−9
−175%
Dota 2 128
+198%
40−45
−198%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+138%
30−35
−138%
Fortnite 70−75
+143%
30−33
−143%
Forza Horizon 4 65
+71.1%
35−40
−71.1%
Valorant 73
+128%
30−35
−128%

This is how RTX 2070 Super and Arc A550M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super is 106% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Super is 98% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Super is 113% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2070 Super is 198% faster.
  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A550M is 8% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super is ahead in 61 test (97%)
  • Arc A550M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 47.38 24.55
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 215 Watt 60 Watt

RTX 2070 Super has a 93% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc A550M, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 258.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A550M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Super is a desktop card while Arc A550M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Intel Arc A550M
Arc A550M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 5074 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 81 vote

Rate Arc A550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.