Radeon Pro W5700 vs GeForce RTX 2060

Place in performance ranking	123	103
Place by popularity	31	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	21.03	40.09
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	Turing TU106	Navi 10
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	6 January 2019 (5 years ago)	19 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$349	$799
Current price	$397 (1.1x MSRP)	$748 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro W5700 has 91% better value for money than RTX 2060.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	2304
Core clock speed	1320 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	1930 MHz
Number of transistors	10,800 million	10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	175 Watt	205 Watt
Texture fill rate	201.6	277.9

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	229 mm	305 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	336.0 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	+	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2060 36.56

Pro W5700 39.33
+7.6%

Radeon Pro W5700 outperforms GeForce RTX 2060 by 8% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 2060 14151

Pro W5700 15222
+7.6%

Radeon Pro W5700 outperforms GeForce RTX 2060 by 8% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	121 −7.4%	130−140 +7.4%
1440p	76 −5.3%	80−85 +5.3%
4K	50 +0%	50−55 +0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

60−65

−1.6%

65−70
+1.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	92 −3.3%	95−100 +3.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	79 −1.3%	80−85 +1.3%
Battlefield 5	145 −3.4%	150−160 +3.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	135 −3.7%	140−150 +3.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −1.6%	65−70 +1.6%
Far Cry 5	103 −6.8%	110−120 +6.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	101 +1%	100−105 −1%
Forza Horizon 4	140 −7.1%	150−160 +7.1%
Hitman 3	110−120 −3.4%	120−130 +3.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	101 +1%	100−105 −1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	102 +2%	100−105 −2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	107 −2.8%	110−120 +2.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	101 +1%	100−105 −1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	78 −2.6%	80−85 +2.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	64 −1.6%	65−70 +1.6%
Battlefield 5	129 −0.8%	130−140 +0.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	118 −1.7%	120−130 +1.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −1.6%	65−70 +1.6%
Far Cry 5	99 −1%	100−105 +1%
Far Cry New Dawn	97 −3.1%	100−105 +3.1%
Forza Horizon 4	131 −6.9%	140−150 +6.9%
Hitman 3	110−120 −3.4%	120−130 +3.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	78 −2.6%	80−85 +2.6%
Metro Exodus	67 −4.5%	70−75 +4.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	56 −7.1%	60−65 +7.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	96 −4.2%	100−105 +4.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	136 −2.9%	140−150 +2.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	87 −3.4%	90−95 +3.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	56 −7.1%	60−65 +7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55 +0%	55−60 +0%
Battlefield 5	119 −0.8%	120−130 +0.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −1.6%	65−70 +1.6%
Far Cry 5	94 −6.4%	100−105 +6.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	88 −2.3%	90−95 +2.3%
Forza Horizon 4	105 −4.8%	110−120 +4.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	73 −2.7%	75−80 +2.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45 +0%	45−50 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	76 −5.3%	80−85 +5.3%
Hitman 3	65−70 −4.5%	70−75 +4.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	52 −5.8%	55−60 +5.8%
Metro Exodus	42 −7.1%	45−50 +7.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35 +0%	35−40 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −1.9%	55−60 +1.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	42 −7.1%	45−50 +7.1%
Battlefield 5	75−80 −2.6%	80−85 +2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −7.1%	30−33 +7.1%
Far Cry 5	65−70 −6.1%	70−75 +6.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	76 −5.3%	80−85 +5.3%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −3.9%	80−85 +3.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +2%	50−55 −2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30 +0%	30−33 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	43 −4.7%	45−50 +4.7%
Hitman 3	35−40 +2.9%	35−40 −2.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	15 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Metro Exodus	26 −3.8%	27−30 +3.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24 +0%	24−27 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	32 +6.7%	30−33 −6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	51 +2%	50−55 −2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	28 −7.1%	30−33 +7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24 +0%	24−27 +0%
Battlefield 5	53 −3.8%	55−60 +3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Far Cry 5	41 +2.5%	40−45 −2.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	42 −7.1%	45−50 +7.1%
Forza Horizon 4	59 −1.7%	60−65 +1.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	17 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%

This is how RTX 2060 and Pro W5700 compete in popular games:

Pro W5700 is 7.4% faster than RTX 2060 in 1080p
Pro W5700 is 5.3% faster than RTX 2060 in 1440p
Pro W5700 is 0% faster than RTX 2060 in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	36.56	39.33
Recency	6 January 2019	19 November 2019
Cost	$349	$799
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	175 Watt	205 Watt