Radeon Pro W5700 vs GeForce RTX 2070

Place in performance ranking	83	101
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	31.18	41.83
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	Turing TU106	Navi 10
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	27 August 2018 (5 years ago)	19 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	$799
Current price	$309 (0.6x MSRP)	$748 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro W5700 has 34% better value for money than RTX 2070.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	2304
Core clock speed	1410 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	1930 MHz
Number of transistors	10,800 million	10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	175 Watt	205 Watt
Texture fill rate	233.3	277.9

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	229 mm	305 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	+	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2070 41.86
+6.4%

Pro W5700 39.35

GeForce RTX 2070 outperforms Radeon Pro W5700 by 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 2070 16165
+6.4%

Pro W5700 15196

GeForce RTX 2070 outperforms Radeon Pro W5700 by 6% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	131 +9.2%	120−130 −9.2%
1440p	85 +13.3%	75−80 −13.3%
4K	61 +10.9%	55−60 −10.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

75−80
+1.4%

70−75

−1.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	100−105 −1%	101 +1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 +3.4%	87 −3.4%
Battlefield 5	170−180 +3.7%	164 −3.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +3.4%	116 −3.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +1.4%	70−75 −1.4%
Far Cry 5	130−140 +4.8%	124 −4.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	150−160 +1.4%	148 −1.4%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +5.6%	142 −5.6%
Hitman 3	120−130 +3.4%	116 −3.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	240−250 +3.9%	231 −3.9%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +4.2%	144 −4.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +0%	110 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	170−180 +1.8%	160−170 −1.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +2.8%	107 −2.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 +4.7%	86 −4.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	75−80 +2.7%	73 −2.7%
Battlefield 5	160−170 +2.6%	156 −2.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +3.8%	106 −3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +1.4%	70−75 −1.4%
Far Cry 5	100−105 −1%	101 +1%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 +1.9%	108 −1.9%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +5.7%	227 −5.7%
Hitman 3	95−100 +2.2%	93 −2.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	260−270 +4.8%	248 −4.8%
Metro Exodus	120−130 −1.7%	122 +1.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−105 −3%	103 +3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	170−180 +1.8%	160−170 −1.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	160−170 +1.3%	158 −1.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	250−260 +2.5%	244 −2.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70 +1.6%	64 −1.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 +0%	65 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +2.6%	78 −2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +1.4%	70−75 −1.4%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +1.3%	79 −1.3%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +0%	110 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 +0.7%	139 −0.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	170−180 +1.8%	160−170 −1.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90−95 +3.4%	87 −3.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +1.6%	64 −1.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

100−105

+1%

99
−1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +3.8%	106 −3.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	130−140 +0%	130 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +5.8%	52 −5.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 +0%	50 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 +0%	75 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +2.9%	30−35 −2.9%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +2.3%	88 −2.3%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +2.2%	93 −2.2%
Hitman 3	65−70 +1.6%	64 −1.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +5.8%	104 −5.8%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +3.7%	82 −3.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 −3%	100−110 +3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 +4.8%	60−65 −4.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −4.4%	47 +4.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

85−90
+1.2%

−1.2%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +3.8%	53 −3.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +2.3%	44 −2.3%
Hitman 3	40−45 −2.5%	41 +2.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +1.9%	50−55 −1.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +0%	40 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 +3.2%	63 −3.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −2.9%	36 +2.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −3.3%	31 +3.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +6.1%	33 −6.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −3.3%	31 +3.3%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +3.2%	63 −3.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −1.7%	61 +1.7%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −2%	51 +2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +0%	27 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50

−4.4%

47
+4.4%

This is how RTX 2070 and Pro W5700 compete in popular games:

RTX 2070 is 9% faster in 1080p
RTX 2070 is 13% faster in 1440p
RTX 2070 is 11% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	41.86	39.35
Recency	27 August 2018	19 November 2019
Cost	$499	$799
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	175 Watt	205 Watt