Radeon Pro 5600M vs GeForce RTX 2060

Place in performance ranking	122	211
Place by popularity	23	not in top-100
Value for money	21.02	no data
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code name	Turing TU106	Navi 10
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	6 January 2019 (5 years old)	15 June 2020 (3 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	$349	no data
Current price	$397 (1.1x MSRP)	no data

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	2560
Core clock speed	1320 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	1265 MHz
Number of transistors	10,800 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	175 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	201.6	164.8

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon Pro 5600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	229 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	2048 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	1540 MBps
Memory bandwidth	336.0 GB/s	394.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2060 36.53
+52%

Pro 5600M 24.04

GeForce RTX 2060 outperforms Radeon Pro 5600M by 52% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 2060 14150
+51.9%

Pro 5600M 9313

GeForce RTX 2060 outperforms Radeon Pro 5600M by 52% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	121 +61.3%	75−80 −61.3%
1440p	76 +52%	50−55 −52%
4K	50 +66.7%	30−35 −66.7%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

60−65
+64.1%

35−40

−64.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	92 +91.7%	45−50 −91.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	79 +88.1%	40−45 −88.1%
Battlefield 5	145 +85.9%	75−80 −85.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	135 +114%	60−65 −114%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +64.1%	35−40 −64.1%
Far Cry 5	103 +63.5%	60−65 −63.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	101 +57.8%	60−65 −57.8%
Forza Horizon 4	140 +72.8%	80−85 −72.8%
Hitman 3	110−120 +61.1%	70−75 −61.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	101 +98%	50−55 −98%
Red Dead Redemption 2	102 +162%	35−40 −162%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	107 +102%	50−55 −102%
Watch Dogs: Legion	101 +120%	45−50 −120%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	78 +62.5%	45−50 −62.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	64 +52.4%	40−45 −52.4%
Battlefield 5	129 +65.4%	75−80 −65.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	118 +87.3%	60−65 −87.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +64.1%	35−40 −64.1%
Far Cry 5	99 +57.1%	60−65 −57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	97 +51.6%	60−65 −51.6%
Forza Horizon 4	131 +61.7%	80−85 −61.7%
Hitman 3	110−120 +61.1%	70−75 −61.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	78 +52.9%	50−55 −52.9%
Metro Exodus	67 +67.5%	40−45 −67.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	56 +43.6%	35−40 −43.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	96 +81.1%	50−55 −81.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	136 +152%	50−55 −152%
Watch Dogs: Legion	87 +89.1%	45−50 −89.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	56 +16.7%	45−50 −16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55 +31%	40−45 −31%
Battlefield 5	119 +52.6%	75−80 −52.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +64.1%	35−40 −64.1%
Far Cry 5	94 +49.2%	60−65 −49.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	88 +37.5%	60−65 −37.5%
Forza Horizon 4	105 +29.6%	80−85 −29.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	73 +35.2%	50−55 −35.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45 −2.2%	45−50 +2.2%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	76 +105%	35−40 −105%
Hitman 3	65−70 +67.5%	40−45 −67.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	52 +62.5%	30−35 −62.5%
Metro Exodus	42 +75%	24−27 −75%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35 +94.4%	18−20 −94.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 +68.8%	30−35 −68.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +53.8%	24−27 −53.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	42 +75%	24−27 −75%
Battlefield 5	75−80 +44.4%	50−55 −44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +86.7%	14−16 −86.7%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +61%	40−45 −61%
Far Cry New Dawn	76 +65.2%	45−50 −65.2%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +57.1%	45−50 −57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +82.1%	27−30 −82.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30 +66.7%	18−20 −66.7%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	43 +126%	18−20 −126%
Hitman 3	35−40 +56.5%	21−24 −56.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	15 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Metro Exodus	26 +73.3%	14−16 −73.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24 +84.6%	12−14 −84.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	32 +88.2%	16−18 −88.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	51 +96.2%	24−27 −96.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	28 +86.7%	14−16 −86.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24 +84.6%	12−14 −84.6%
Battlefield 5	53 +89.3%	27−30 −89.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Far Cry 5	41 +105%	20−22 −105%
Far Cry New Dawn	42 +82.6%	21−24 −82.6%
Forza Horizon 4	59 +73.5%	30−35 −73.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	17 +54.5%	10−12 −54.5%

This is how RTX 2060 and Pro 5600M compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

RTX 2060 is 61.3% faster than Pro 5600M

1440p resolution:

RTX 2060 is 52% faster than Pro 5600M

4K resolution:

RTX 2060 is 66.7% faster than Pro 5600M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2060 is 162% faster than the Pro 5600M.
in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 5600M is 6.7% faster than the RTX 2060.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 2060 is ahead in 66 tests (97%)
Pro 5600M is ahead in 2 tests (3%)

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	36.53	24.04
Recency	6 January 2019	15 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	175 Watt	50 Watt