Arc A730M vs GeForce MX570

Place in performance ranking	332	135
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2022)	Xe HPG (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GN20-S5	Alchemist
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	17 December 2021 (2 years ago)	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	384
Core clock speed	no data	1100 MHz
Boost clock speed	1477 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	no data	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15-45 Watt	120 Watt (80 - 120 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	73.92	211.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce MX570 and Arc A730M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	8.6	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX570 14.89

Arc A730M 35.31
+137%

Arc A730M outperforms GeForce MX570 by 137% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce MX570 5749

Arc A730M 10487
+82.4%

Arc A730M outperforms GeForce MX570 by 82% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	30−35 −140%	72 +140%
1440p	18−20 −144%	44 +144%
4K	10−12 −150%	25 +150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

27−30

−163%

71
+163%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −163%	60−65 +163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −167%	64 +167%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −153%	110−120 +153%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −140%	70−75 +140%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −167%	64 +167%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −160%	75−80 +160%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −154%	85−90 +154%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −153%	130−140 +153%
Hitman 3	21−24 −143%	51 +143%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −155%	153 +155%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −163%	100−110 +163%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −151%	85−90 +151%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 −137%	178 +137%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −143%	85 +143%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −163%	60−65 +163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −157%	54 +157%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −153%	110−120 +153%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −140%	70−75 +140%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −157%	54 +157%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −160%	75−80 +160%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −154%	85−90 +154%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −153%	130−140 +153%
Hitman 3	10−11 −140%	24 +140%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −158%	140−150 +158%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −156%	41 +156%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −151%	85−90 +151%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 −148%	149 +148%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −144%	110 +144%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −157%	90−95 +157%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −163%	60−65 +163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −167%	48 +167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −140%	70−75 +140%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −148%	52 +148%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −160%	75−80 +160%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −153%	130−140 +153%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −151%	88 +151%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −148%	124 +148%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −150%	45 +150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −167%	48 +167%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40

−151%

85−90
+151%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −148%	65−70 +148%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 −170%	80−85 +170%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −138%	35−40 +138%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −164%	37 +164%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −148%	50−55 +148%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −158%	31 +158%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −163%	60−65 +163%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −143%	70−75 +143%
Hitman 3	16−18 −144%	39 +144%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −144%	66 +144%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −148%	65−70 +148%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −140%	80−85 +140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −172%	45−50 +172%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −150%	35 +150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

−150%

60−65
+150%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −142%	27−30 +142%
Hitman 3	12−14 −142%	27−30 +142%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −144%	40−45 +144%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −180%	28 +180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −156%	40−45 +156%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −156%	21−24 +156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −144%	21−24 +144%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −175%	10−12 +175%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −150%	20−22 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −172%	45−50 +172%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −150%	40 +150%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −144%	39 +144%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −143%	16−18 +143%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−158%

30−35
+158%

This is how GeForce MX570 and Arc A730M compete in popular games:

Arc A730M is 140% faster in 1080p
Arc A730M is 144% faster in 1440p
Arc A730M is 150% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	14.89	35.31
Recency	17 December 2021	30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	120 Watt