HD Graphics P530 vs GeForce GTX 760

Place in performance ranking	370	762
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.43	0.12
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Gen. 9 Skylake (2015−2016)
GPU code name	GK104	Skylake GT2
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	25 June 2013 (11 years ago)	1 September 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$249	no data
Current price	$136 (0.5x MSRP)	$895

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 760 has 3592% better value for money than HD Graphics P530.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1152	24
CUDA cores	1152	no data
Core clock speed	980 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1033 MHz	1050 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	15 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	94.1 billion/sec	18.40
Floating-point performance	2,378 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 760 and HD Graphics P530 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Length	9.5" (24.1 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Minimum recommended system power	500 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	Two 6-pin	no data
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1740 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	3000 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	192.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort	No outputs
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D	+	no data
3D Gaming	+	no data
3D Vision	+	no data
PhysX	+	no data
3D Vision Live	+	no data
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.97
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 760 12.41
+346%

HD Graphics P530 2.78

GeForce GTX 760 outperforms HD Graphics P530 by 346% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 760 4793
+346%

HD Graphics P530 1074

GeForce GTX 760 outperforms HD Graphics P530 by 346% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

66
+371%

14−16

−371%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
Battlefield 5	40−45	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20	no data
Far Cry 5	27−30	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35	no data
Forza Horizon 4	60−65	no data
Hitman 3	24−27	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55	no data
Metro Exodus	40−45 +400%	8−9 −400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
Battlefield 5	40−45	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20	no data
Far Cry 5	27−30	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35	no data
Forza Horizon 4	60−65	no data
Hitman 3	24−27	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55	no data
Metro Exodus	40−45 +400%	8−9 −400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20	no data
Far Cry 5	27−30	no data
Forza Horizon 4	60−65	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7	no data
Far Cry 5	20−22	no data
Forza Horizon 4	21−24	no data
Hitman 3	14−16	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27	no data
Metro Exodus	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

20−22

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10	no data
Hitman 3	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Far Cry 5	7−8	no data
Forza Horizon 4	16−18	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14	no data
Metro Exodus	12−14	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6	no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

no data

This is how GTX 760 and HD Graphics P530 compete in popular games:

GTX 760 is 371% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	12.41	2.78
Recency	25 June 2013	1 September 2015
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1740 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	15 Watt