Quadro K620M vs GeForce MX570 A

Place in performance ranking	311	734
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2022)	Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code name	GA107	GM108
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	May 2022 (2 years ago)	1 March 2015 (9 years ago)
Current price	$1574	no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	384
Core clock speed	no data	1029 MHz
Boost clock speed	1155 MHz	1124 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	30 Watt
Texture fill rate	73.92	17.98
Floating-point performance	no data	863.2 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on GeForce MX570 A and Quadro K620M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	MXM-A (3.0)
Width	IGP	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

Memory type	GDDR6	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	12 GB/s	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	no data	1.2

Supported Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	no data	+
nView Display Management	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12
Shader Model	6.6	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	3.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.1.126
CUDA	8.6	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

MX570 A 15.96
+432%

Quadro K620M 3.00

GeForce MX570 A outperforms Quadro K620M by 432% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

MX570 A 6179
+432%

Quadro K620M 1162

GeForce MX570 A outperforms Quadro K620M by 432% in Passmark.