RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs GeForce MX450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX450 with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX450
2020
2 GB GDDR5, GDDR6, 25 Watt
8.41

2000 Ada Generation outperforms MX450 by a whopping 362% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking515110
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.12
Power efficiency27.1144.71
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameN17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1AD107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 August 2020 (5 years ago)12 February 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8962816
Core clock speed1395 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed1575 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)70 Watt
Texture fill rate100.8187.4
Floating-point processing power3.226 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs6488
Tensor Coresno data88
Ray Tracing Coresno data22
L1 Cacheno data2.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5, GDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.03 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.58.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce MX450 8.41
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 38.83
+362%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX450 3717
Samples: 1429
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17171
+362%
Samples: 419

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GeForce MX450 28918
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 86047
+198%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GeForce MX450 27603
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 81053
+194%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
−329%
120−130
+329%
1440p16
−338%
70−75
+338%
4K25
−340%
110−120
+340%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.41
1440pno data9.27
4Kno data5.90

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 88
−355%
400−450
+355%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
−338%
140−150
+338%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−338%
70−75
+338%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 49
−349%
220−230
+349%
Counter-Strike 2 67
−348%
300−310
+348%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
−355%
100−105
+355%
Far Cry 5 34
−341%
150−160
+341%
Fortnite 61
−359%
280−290
+359%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−362%
180−190
+362%
Forza Horizon 5 34
−341%
150−160
+341%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−338%
70−75
+338%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−338%
140−150
+338%
Valorant 85−90
−349%
400−450
+349%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 38
−347%
170−180
+347%
Counter-Strike 2 28
−329%
120−130
+329%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−335%
600−650
+335%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
−362%
60−65
+362%
Dota 2 88
−355%
400−450
+355%
Far Cry 5 29
−348%
130−140
+348%
Fortnite 39
−362%
180−190
+362%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−362%
180−190
+362%
Forza Horizon 5 26
−362%
120−130
+362%
Grand Theft Auto V 38
−347%
170−180
+347%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−338%
70−75
+338%
Metro Exodus 10
−350%
45−50
+350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−338%
140−150
+338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
−355%
150−160
+355%
Valorant 85−90
−349%
400−450
+349%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30
−333%
130−140
+333%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
−338%
35−40
+338%
Dota 2 81
−332%
350−400
+332%
Far Cry 5 27
−344%
120−130
+344%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−362%
180−190
+362%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−338%
70−75
+338%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−338%
140−150
+338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−350%
90−95
+350%
Valorant 85−90
−349%
400−450
+349%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 25
−340%
110−120
+340%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−341%
75−80
+341%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−335%
300−310
+335%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
−355%
50−55
+355%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−344%
200−210
+344%
Valorant 100−105
−350%
450−500
+350%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 22
−355%
100−105
+355%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Far Cry 5 20
−350%
90−95
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−352%
95−100
+352%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−362%
60−65
+362%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
−347%
85−90
+347%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−350%
90−95
+350%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Valorant 45−50
−347%
210−220
+347%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Dota 2 32
−338%
140−150
+338%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−333%
65−70
+333%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%

This is how GeForce MX450 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 329% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 338% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 340% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.41 38.83
Recency 1 August 2020 12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 70 Watt

GeForce MX450 has 180% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 361.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX450 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX450 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1409 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 62 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX450 or RTX 2000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.