Quadro K3000M vs GeForce MX350

Place in performance ranking	508	644
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.86
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1	N14E-Q1
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	20 February 2020 (4 years ago)	1 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$155
Current price	no data	$223 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	576
Core clock speed	1354 MHz	654 MHz
Boost clock speed	1468 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,300 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	29.98	31.39
Floating-point performance	no data	753.4 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce MX350 and Quadro K3000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	56.06 GB/s	89.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	+
CUDA	6.1	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX350 7.27
+71.5%

K3000M 4.24

GeForce MX350 outperforms Quadro K3000M by 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce MX350 2807
+71.5%

K3000M 1637

GeForce MX350 outperforms Quadro K3000M by 71% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce MX350 6166
+154%

K3000M 2427

GeForce MX350 outperforms Quadro K3000M by 154% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GeForce MX350 12712
+202%

K3000M 4216

GeForce MX350 outperforms Quadro K3000M by 202% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	55−60 +66.7%	33 −66.7%
Full HD	26 −73.1%	45 +73.1%
1440p	27 +92.9%	14−16 −92.9%
4K	29 +81.3%	16−18 −81.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	22	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	13	no data
Battlefield 5	21−24	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	19	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14	no data
Far Cry 5	26	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	35	no data
Forza Horizon 4	37	no data
Hitman 3	20	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	49	no data
Metro Exodus	37	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	32	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	32	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	18	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6	no data
Battlefield 5	21−24	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	17	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14	no data
Far Cry 5	23	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	25	no data
Forza Horizon 4	35−40	no data
Hitman 3	16	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	116	no data
Metro Exodus	26	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	24	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	25	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	88	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14	no data
Far Cry 5	15	no data
Forza Horizon 4	19	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	20	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	19	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	6	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	no data
Far Cry 5	10−12	no data
Forza Horizon 4	12−14	no data
Hitman 3	10−12	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18	no data
Metro Exodus	8−9	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6	no data
Hitman 3	3−4	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	no data
Far Cry 5	4−5	no data
Forza Horizon 4	8−9	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8	no data
Metro Exodus	8−9	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	no data