NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now no data
Games supported 67%
NVIDIA GeForce MX350
NVIDIA GeForce MX350
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 1354
  • Max video memory 2 GB
  • Memory type GDDR5
  • Memory clock speed 7000
  • Maximum resolution
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Buy
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed 300
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type DDR4
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Price now no data
Games supported 69%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating428409
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameN17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date20 February 2020 (2 years ago)28 May 2019 (3 years ago)

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64064
Core clock speed1354 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)25 Watt12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate29.98no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on GeForce MX350 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed7000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth56.06 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data
CUDA6.1no data

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX350 7.29
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 7.77
+6.6%
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • 3DMark Ice Storm GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce MX350 6166
+47.3%
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 4187

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GeForce MX350 24744
+48.1%
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 16713

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GeForce MX350 3985
+57.4%
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 2532

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GeForce MX350 4371
+60.8%
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 2718

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

GeForce MX350 285166
+95.9%
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 145594

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD29
+61.1%
18
−61.1%
1440p27no data
4K25no data

Popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 22
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Battlefield 5 37
+106%
18
−106%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 27
+125%
12
−125%
Far Cry New Dawn 28
+64.7%
17
−64.7%
Forza Horizon 4 37
+185%
13
−185%
Hitman 3 22
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18
+63.6%
11
−63.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 23
+64.3%
14
−64.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Battlefield 5 30
+87.5%
16
−87.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20
−5%
21−24
+5%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 23
+130%
10
−130%
Far Cry New Dawn 26
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hitman 3 18
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 12
+140%
5
−140%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 15
+114%
7
−114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27
+50%
18
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
−87.5%
14−16
+87.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Battlefield 5 24
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 21
+90.9%
11
−90.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 23
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Forza Horizon 4 19
−36.8%
24−27
+36.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+77.8%
9
−77.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hitman 3 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Hitman 3 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 7.29 7.77
Recency 20 February 2020 28 May 2019
Pipelines / CUDA cores 640 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Thermal design power (TDP) 25 Watt 12 Watt

Technical City couldn't decide between

NVIDIA GeForce MX350
NVIDIA GeForce MX350

and

Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of GeForce MX350 by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce MX350 from AMD is Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000), which is slower by 1% and lower by 4 positions in our rating.

AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce MX350:

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 906 ratings

Rate NVIDIA GeForce MX350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 156 ratings

Rate Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.