GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs Go 7950 GTX

Place in performance ranking	1138	4
Place by popularity	not in top-100	74
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	21.28
Architecture	G7x (2005−2007)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	G71M	AD103-400-A1
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	12 October 2006 (17 years ago)	31 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999
Current price	no data	$1202 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	10240
Core clock speed	8 MHz	2295 MHz
Boost clock speed	575 MHz	2550 MHz
Number of transistors	278 million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	320 Watt
Texture fill rate	13.80	816.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce Go 7950 GTX and GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-III	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	310 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1400 MHz	23000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	44.8 GB/s	716.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	3.0	6.7
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Go 7950 GTX 0.68

RTX 4080 SUPER 88.26
+12879%

RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms Go 7950 GTX by 12879% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Go 7950 GTX 263

RTX 4080 SUPER 34082
+12859%

RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms Go 7950 GTX by 12859% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	1−2 −25300%	254 +25300%
1440p	1−2 −17800%	179 +17800%
4K	0−1	117

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

0−1

3−4

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −23400%	235 +23400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	120−130
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	3−4
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −20000%	200−210 +20000%
Hitman 3	0−1	120−130
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −16667%	503 +16667%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −15250%	614 +15250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −14900%	150−160 +14900%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −21100%	212 +21100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	120−130
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	3−4
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −20000%	200−210 +20000%
Hitman 3	0−1	120−130
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −18450%	350−400 +18450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −14100%	568 +14100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −13575%	547 +13575%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −14900%	150−160 +14900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −15700%	158 +15700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	120−130
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	3−4
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −14067%	425 +14067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −13075%	527 +13075%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −13050%	263 +13050%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −14400%	145 +14400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −13400%	135 +13400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	110−120
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	1−2 −21200%	213 +21200%
Hitman 3	0−1	120−130
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −17150%	345 +17150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

0−1

120−130

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	65−70
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −16800%	169 +16800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	96
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −20500%	206 +20500%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −14100%	142 +14100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

0−1

110−120

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −13950%	281 +13950%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −24300%	240−250 +24300%
Far Cry 5	0−1	110−120
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −17100%	344 +17100%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −15000%	150−160 +15000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	120−130

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −23600%	237 +23600%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −24300%	240−250 +24300%
Far Cry 5	0−1	110−120
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −13400%	270−280 +13400%
Metro Exodus	0−1	95
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	120−130

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −20800%	209 +20800%
Far Cry 5	0−1	110−120
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −16000%	322 +16000%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

0−1

120−130

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −16500%	160−170 +16500%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −14300%	140−150 +14300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −16400%	165 +16400%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −15200%	306 +15200%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −17000%	171 +17000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4 −13133%	397 +13133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −22000%	221 +22000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	127

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	85−90
Hitman 3	0−1	80−85
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2 −13400%	135 +13400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −20300%	204 +20300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	99
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	50−55
Far Cry 5	0−1	50−55
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −15150%	305 +15150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	81

This is how Go 7950 GTX and RTX 4080 SUPER compete in popular games:

RTX 4080 SUPER is 25300% faster in 1080p
RTX 4080 SUPER is 17800% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.68	88.26
Recency	12 October 2006	31 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	16 GB
Chip lithography	90 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	320 Watt