GeForce RTX 4070 vs Go 7950 GTX

Place in the ranking	1180	20
Place by popularity	not in top-100	34
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	59.54
Power efficiency	1.04	24.13
Architecture	Curie (2003−2013)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	G71	AD104
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	12 October 2006 (18 years ago)	12 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	5888
Core clock speed	575 MHz	1920 MHz
Boost clock speed	575 MHz	2475 MHz
Number of transistors	278 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	200 Watt
Texture fill rate	13.80	455.4
Floating-point processing power	no data	29.15 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	64
TMUs	24	184
Tensor Cores	no data	184
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-III	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	240 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	12 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	700 MHz	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	44.8 GB/s	504.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	3.0	6.7
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Go 7950 GTX 0.68

RTX 4070 70.10
+10209%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7950 GTX 263

RTX 4070 26950
+10147%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	2−3 −10750%	217 +10750%
1440p	1−2 −12300%	124 +12300%
4K	0−1	77

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.76
1440p	no data	4.83
4K	no data	7.78

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1733%	160−170 +1733%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −10700%	216 +10700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1733%	160−170 +1733%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −4250%	87 +4250%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −7933%	482 +7933%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −2460%	120−130 +2460%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1733%	160−170 +1733%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −3450%	71 +3450%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −1850%	156 +1850%
Fortnite	1−2 −27500%	270−280 +27500%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −6167%	376 +6167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −2289%	210−220 +2289%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −2460%	120−130 +2460%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −3380%	170−180 +3380%
World of Tanks	18−20 −1450%	270−280 +1450%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1733%	160−170 +1733%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −3100%	64 +3100%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −1550%	130−140 +1550%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −5267%	322 +5267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −2289%	210−220 +2289%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 −4275%	170−180 +4275%
World of Tanks	2−3 −24550%	450−500 +24550%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −944%	90−95 +944%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1900%	40 +1900%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −3900%	160−170 +3900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −7700%	150−160 +7700%
Valorant	5−6 −6000%	300−350 +6000%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −873%	146 +873%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −873%	146 +873%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −10350%	200−210 +10350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −873%	146 +873%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	90−95
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1700%	18 +1700%
Dota 2	14−16 −9900%	1500−1550 +9900%
Valorant	1−2 −17500%	170−180 +17500%

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring

233

+0%

233

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Metro Exodus	174 +0%	174 +0%
Valorant	350−400 +0%	350−400 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Dota 2	174 +0%	174 +0%
Elden Ring	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	174 +0%	174 +0%
Metro Exodus	149 +0%	149 +0%
Valorant	350−400 +0%	350−400 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Valorant	350−400 +0%	350−400 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	137 +0%	137 +0%
Elden Ring	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	137 +0%	137 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	222 +0%	222 +0%
Metro Exodus	143 +0%	143 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Elden Ring	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Metro Exodus	65 +0%	65 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Fortnite	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	121 +0%	121 +0%

This is how Go 7950 GTX and RTX 4070 compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 is 10750% faster in 1080p
RTX 4070 is 12300% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4070 is 27500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 4070 is ahead in 33 tests (55%)
there's a draw in 27 tests (45%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.68	70.10
Recency	12 October 2006	12 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	12 GB
Chip lithography	90 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	200 Watt

Go 7950 GTX has 344.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070, on the other hand, has a 10208.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7950 GTX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7950 GTX is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4070 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.