Arc A380 vs GeForce Go 7800 GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 7800 GTX with Arc A380, including specs and performance data.

Go 7800 GTX
2005
512 MB GDDR3, 65 Watt
0.54

Arc A380 outperforms Go 7800 GTX by a whopping 2883% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1227333
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data43.85
ArchitectureG7x (2005−2007)Xe HPG (2022−2023)
GPU code nameG70MDG2-128
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 September 2005 (18 years ago)14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores321024
Core clock speed8 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed440 MHzno data
Number of transistors302 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate10.56131.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data222 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speedno data15500 MHz
Memory bandwidth35.2 GB/s186.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Go 7800 GTX 0.54
Arc A380 16.11
+2883%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7800 GTX 209
Arc A380 6213
+2873%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−4800%
49
+4800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1425%
61
+1425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1933%
60−65
+1933%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−7500%
75−80
+7500%
Hitman 3 5−6
−1140%
60−65
+1140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−1220%
130−140
+1220%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−1617%
100−110
+1617%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−277%
110−120
+277%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1700%
72
+1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1933%
60−65
+1933%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−7500%
75−80
+7500%
Hitman 3 5−6
−1140%
60−65
+1140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−1220%
130−140
+1220%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−1233%
80
+1233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−530%
60−65
+530%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−277%
110−120
+277%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−625%
29
+625%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1933%
60−65
+1933%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
Hitman 3 5−6
−1140%
60−65
+1140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−420%
52
+420%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−917%
61
+917%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−240%
34
+240%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
+20%
25
−20%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 30−35
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−3300%
30−35
+3300%
Hitman 3 6−7
−500%
35−40
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−1967%
60−65
+1967%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−15900%
160−170
+15900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1800%
18−20
+1800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 16−18

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1200%
24−27
+1200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50
+0%
50
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 37
+0%
37
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 31
+0%
31
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 57
+0%
57
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hitman 3 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how Go 7800 GTX and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A380 is 4800% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Go 7800 GTX is 20% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A380 is 15900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Go 7800 GTX is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • Arc A380 is ahead in 29 tests (45%)
  • there's a draw in 34 tests (53%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.54 16.11
Recency 29 September 2005 14 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 75 Watt

Go 7800 GTX has 15.4% lower power consumption.

Arc A380, on the other hand, has a 2883.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1733.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A380 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7800 GTX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7800 GTX is a notebook card while Arc A380 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 GTX
GeForce Go 7800 GTX
Intel Arc A380
Arc A380

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 7 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 778 votes

Rate Arc A380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.