Radeon 740M vs FirePro M3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated598
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.23
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameSeymourPhoenix2
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date19 October 2010 (15 years ago)31 January 2024 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160256
Core clock speed750 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz2800 MHz
Number of transistors370 million20,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate6.00044.80
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS2.867 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs816
Ray Tracing Coresno data4
L0 Cacheno data64 KB
L1 Cache16 KB64 KB
L2 Cache128 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Form factorchip-downno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent
Eyefinity+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2010 31 January 2024
Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 45 Watt

FirePro M3900 has 125% lower power consumption.

Radeon 740M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M3900 and Radeon 740M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M3900 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon 740M is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 13 votes

Rate FirePro M3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 197 votes

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M3900 or Radeon 740M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.