UHD Graphics vs GeForce Go 6800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 6800 and UHD Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Go 6800
2004
256 MB GDDR3, 45 Watt
0.25

Graphics outperforms Go 6800 by a whopping 1956% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1422670
Place by popularitynot in top-1001
Power efficiency0.4339.50
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameNV41Jasper Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date8 November 2004 (21 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17256
Core clock speed300 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistors190 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate3.60012.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIRing Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed550 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth35.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Go 6800 0.25
UHD Graphics 5.14
+1956%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 6800 106
Samples: 21
UHD Graphics 2151
+1929%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%
Valorant 24−27
−1900%
500−550
+1900%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−1900%
260−270
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Dota 2 9−10
−1900%
180−190
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Valorant 24−27
−1900%
500−550
+1900%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Dota 2 9−10
−1900%
180−190
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Valorant 24−27
−1900%
500−550
+1900%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1900%
280−290
+1900%
Valorant 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 5.14
Recency 8 November 2004 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 130 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 10 Watt

UHD Graphics has a 1956% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 1200% more advanced lithography process, and 350% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6800 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800
GeForce Go 6800
Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 9764 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6800 or UHD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.