UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs GeForce Go 6800

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 6800 and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Go 6800
2004
256 MB GDDR3, 45 Watt
0.25

Graphics G4 48EUs outperforms Go 6800 by a whopping 1604% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1415714
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.4311.69
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameNV41Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date8 November 2004 (21 years ago)15 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1748
Core clock speed300 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors190 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed550 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth35.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12_1
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−116

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1000%
11
+1000%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−143%
16−18
+143%
Valorant 24−27
−44%
36
+44%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−92.3%
25
+92.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Dota 2 9−10
−189%
26
+189%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−143%
16−18
+143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−200%
15
+200%
Valorant 24−27
−128%
55−60
+128%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Dota 2 9−10
−167%
24
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−143%
16−18
+143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−60%
8
+60%
Valorant 24−27
−128%
55−60
+128%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−1000%
30−35
+1000%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Valorant 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 46
+0%
46
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 19
+0%
19
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 29
+0%
29
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 15
+0%
15
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Far Cry 5 15
+0%
15
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
+0%
10
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 1000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs performs better in 30 tests (50%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 4.26
Recency 8 November 2004 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 130 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 28 Watt

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has a 1604% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 1200% more advanced lithography process, and 60.7% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6800 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800
GeForce Go 6800
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 541 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6800 or UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.