UHD Graphics vs GeForce Go 6200

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 6200 and UHD Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Go 6200
2006
32 MB DDR, 16 Watt
0.04

UHD Graphics outperforms Go 6200 by a whopping 13425% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1524644
Place by popularitynot in top-1004
Power efficiency0.1838.26
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameNV44 A2Jasper Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2006 (19 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7256
Core clock speed300 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistors75 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology110 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)16 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate1.20012.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed300 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Go 6200 0.04
UHD Graphics 5.41
+13425%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 6200 15
UHD Graphics 2151
+14240%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 3−4
−13233%
400−450
+13233%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 3−4
−13233%
400−450
+13233%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−13400%
270−280
+13400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−13233%
800−850
+13233%
Valorant 24−27
−13233%
3200−3250
+13233%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 3−4
−13233%
400−450
+13233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−13233%
1200−1250
+13233%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
−13025%
1050−1100
+13025%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−13400%
270−280
+13400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−13233%
800−850
+13233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−12900%
650−700
+12900%
Valorant 24−27
−13233%
3200−3250
+13233%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 3−4
−13233%
400−450
+13233%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
−13025%
1050−1100
+13025%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−13400%
270−280
+13400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−13233%
800−850
+13233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−12900%
650−700
+12900%
Valorant 24−27
−13233%
3200−3250
+13233%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−13338%
2150−2200
+13338%
Valorant 1−2
−12900%
130−140
+12900%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−12900%
130−140
+12900%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−13400%
270−280
+13400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.04 5.41
Recency 1 February 2006 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 110 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 16 Watt 10 Watt

UHD Graphics has a 13425% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 1000% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6200 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200
GeForce Go 6200
Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7952 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6200 or UHD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.