UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs GeForce Go 6800
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce Go 6800 and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms Go 6800 by a whopping 748% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1342 | 851 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 0.42 | no data |
Architecture | Curie (2003−2013) | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) |
GPU code name | NV41 | Tiger Lake Xe |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 November 2004 (20 years ago) | 30 March 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 17 | 16 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 300 MHz | 1450 MHz |
Number of transistors | 190 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | no data |
Texture fill rate | 3.600 | no data |
ROPs | 8 | no data |
TMUs | 12 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | large | no data |
Interface | MXM-III | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR3 | no data |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | no data |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | no data |
Memory clock speed | 550 MHz | no data |
Memory bandwidth | 35.2 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Quick Sync | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | 12_1 |
Shader Model | 3.0 | no data |
OpenGL | 2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial) | no data |
OpenCL | N/A | no data |
Vulkan | N/A | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 1−2
−1000%
| 11
+1000%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4
−167%
|
8−9
+167%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−200%
|
6−7
+200%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
−75%
|
7−8
+75%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
−138%
|
18−20
+138%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 4−5
−150%
|
10−11
+150%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 27−30
−28.6%
|
35−40
+28.6%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4
−167%
|
8−9
+167%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−200%
|
6−7
+200%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
−75%
|
7−8
+75%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
−138%
|
18−20
+138%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 4−5
−175%
|
11
+175%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
−44.4%
|
12−14
+44.4%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 27−30
−28.6%
|
35−40
+28.6%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4
−167%
|
8−9
+167%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−200%
|
6−7
+200%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
−75%
|
7−8
+75%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
−138%
|
18−20
+138%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 4−5
−250%
|
14
+250%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
+80%
|
5
−80%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 27−30
−28.6%
|
35−40
+28.6%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Hitman 3 | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 2−3
−200%
|
6−7
+200%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Far Cry 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 0−1 | 0−1 |
This is how Go 6800 and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 1000% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Go 6800 is 80% faster.
- in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 250% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Go 6800 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
- UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is ahead in 28 tests (52%)
- there's a draw in 25 tests (46%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.27 | 2.29 |
Recency | 8 November 2004 | 30 March 2021 |
Chip lithography | 130 nm | 10 nm |
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has a 748.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6800 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.