UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs GeForce Go 6800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 6800 and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Go 6800
2004
256 MB GDDR3, 45 Watt
0.27

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms Go 6800 by a whopping 748% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1342851
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.42no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameNV41Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date8 November 2004 (20 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1716
Core clock speed300 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors190 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate3.600no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed550 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth35.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12_1
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−1000%
11
+1000%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Hitman 3 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−138%
18−20
+138%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−28.6%
35−40
+28.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Hitman 3 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−138%
18−20
+138%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−175%
11
+175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−28.6%
35−40
+28.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Hitman 3 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−138%
18−20
+138%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−250%
14
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+80%
5
−80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−28.6%
35−40
+28.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Hitman 3 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

This is how Go 6800 and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 1000% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Go 6800 is 80% faster.
  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Go 6800 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is ahead in 28 tests (52%)
  • there's a draw in 25 tests (46%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 2.29
Recency 8 November 2004 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 130 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has a 748.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800
GeForce Go 6800
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 361 vote

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.