Radeon Vega 7 vs GeForce GTX TITAN X
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX TITAN X with Radeon Vega 7, including specs and performance data.
GTX TITAN X outperforms Vega 7 by a whopping 349% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 158 | 530 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 39 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 8.12 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 9.33 | 11.56 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | GM200 | Cezanne |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 March 2015 (9 years ago) | 13 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3072 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1075 MHz | 1900 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 8,000 million | 9,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 209.1 | 53.20 |
| Floating-point processing power | 6.691 TFLOPS | 1.702 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 96 | 8 |
| TMUs | 192 | 28 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
| SLI options | 4x | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 336.5 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | No outputs |
| Multi monitor support | 4 displays | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
| HDCP | + | - |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| GameStream | + | - |
| GeForce ShadowPlay | + | - |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | no data |
| GameWorks | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 95−100
+332%
| 22
−332%
|
| 1440p | 120−130
+329%
| 28
−329%
|
| 4K | 85−90
+325%
| 20
−325%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 10.52 | no data |
| 1440p | 8.33 | no data |
| 4K | 11.75 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 33.46 | 7.46 |
| Recency | 17 March 2015 | 13 April 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 45 Watt |
GTX TITAN X has a 348.5% higher aggregate performance score.
Vega 7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 455.6% lower power consumption.
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Vega 7 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX TITAN X is a desktop card while Radeon Vega 7 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
