UHD Graphics 770 vs GeForce GTX TITAN X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX TITAN X and UHD Graphics 770, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX TITAN X
2015
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
33.69
+449%

GTX TITAN X outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by a whopping 449% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking145549
Place by popularitynot in top-10022
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.701.29
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)Alder Lake
GPU code nameGM200Alder Lake xG
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date17 March 2015 (9 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data
Current price$290 (0.3x MSRP)$878

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX TITAN X has 1117% better value for money than UHD Graphics 770.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores307232
CUDA cores3072no data
Core clock speed1000 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1075 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate192 billion/sec26.40
Floating-point performance6,691 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length10.5" (26.7 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotIGP
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors6-pin + 8-pinno data
SLI options4xno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s1550 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX TITAN X 33.69
+449%
UHD Graphics 770 6.14

GeForce GTX TITAN X outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by 449% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX TITAN X 13009
+371%
UHD Graphics 770 2761

GeForce GTX TITAN X outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by 371% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
+429%
17
−429%
4K75−80
+436%
14
−436%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+442%
12
−442%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+438%
12−14
−438%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+438%
13
−438%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+429%
16−18
−429%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+438%
12−14
−438%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+400%
10
−400%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+436%
14−16
−436%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+429%
16−18
−429%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+417%
27−30
−417%
Hitman 3 65−70
+442%
12−14
−442%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+419%
27
−419%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+433%
14−16
−433%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+429%
16−18
−429%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+420%
25
−420%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+420%
24−27
−420%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+438%
12−14
−438%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+429%
16−18
−429%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+438%
12−14
−438%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+400%
10−11
−400%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+436%
14−16
−436%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+429%
16−18
−429%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+417%
27−30
−417%
Hitman 3 65−70
+442%
12−14
−442%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+417%
27−30
−417%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+433%
14−16
−433%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+429%
16−18
−429%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−105
+426%
19
−426%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
+428%
18
−428%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+420%
24−27
−420%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+438%
12−14
−438%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+438%
12−14
−438%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+400%
10−11
−400%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+436%
14−16
−436%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+417%
27−30
−417%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+442%
12
−442%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
+429%
17
−429%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+400%
9
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+420%
24−27
−420%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+429%
16−18
−429%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+442%
12−14
−442%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+445%
10−12
−445%
Hitman 3 50−55
+400%
10−11
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+438%
12−14
−438%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+445%
10−12
−445%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Hitman 3 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%

This is how GTX TITAN X and UHD Graphics 770 compete in popular games:

  • GTX TITAN X is 429% faster in 1080p
  • GTX TITAN X is 436% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.69 6.14
Recency 17 March 2015 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 15 Watt

The GeForce GTX TITAN X is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
GeForce GTX TITAN X
Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 190 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1070 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.