Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
Aggregated performance score
GTX TITAN X
2015
12 GB GDDR5
33.68
RX Vega 56
2017
8 GB HBM2
34.35
+2%
Radeon RX Vega 56 outperforms GeForce GTX TITAN X by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 146 | 143 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 15.30 | 27.00 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019) | Vega (2017−2021) |
| GPU code name | GM200 | Vega |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 17 March 2015 (9 years old) | 14 August 2017 (6 years old) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $399 |
| Current price | $290 (0.3x MSRP) | $224 (0.6x MSRP) |
Value for money
RX Vega 56 has 76% better value for money than GTX TITAN X.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3072 | 3584 |
| CUDA cores | 3072 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1138 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1075 MHz | 1474 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 8,000 million | 12,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 210 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 192 billion/sec | 329.5 |
| Floating-point performance | 6,691 gflops | 10,566 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 267 mm |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin + 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| SLI options | 4x | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 409.6 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 336.5 GB/s | 409.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Multi monitor support | 4 displays | no data |
| HDMI | + | + |
| HDCP | + | no data |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| GameStream | + | no data |
| GeForce ShadowPlay | + | no data |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | no data |
| GameWorks | + | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.125 |
| CUDA | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Radeon RX Vega 56 outperforms GeForce GTX TITAN X by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
Radeon RX Vega 56 outperforms GeForce GTX TITAN X by 2% in Passmark.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 110−120
−5.5%
| 116
+5.5%
|
| 1440p | 75−80
−2.7%
| 77
+2.7%
|
| 4K | 45−50
−6.7%
| 48
+6.7%
|
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 33.68 | 34.35 |
| Recency | 17 March 2015 | 14 August 2017 |
| Cost | $999 | $399 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 210 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX TITAN X and Radeon RX Vega 56.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
