Arc A350M vs GeForce GTX TITAN X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
750 GM206 750 v2 950 950 Low Power 950 OEM 960 960 OEM 970 980 980 Ti TITAN X Tegra X1
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A350M A370M A380M A530M A550M A570M A730M A770M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX TITAN X with Arc A350M, including specs and performance data.

GTX TITAN X
2015, $999
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
30.03
+131%

TITAN X outperforms A350M by a whopping 131% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
Arc A350M Arc A350M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking209418
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.80no data
Power efficiency9.2640.16
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGM200DG2-128
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 March 2015 (10 years ago)30 March 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072768
Core clock speed1000 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1075 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate209.155.20
Floating-point processing power6.691 TFLOPS1.766 TFLOPS
ROPs9624
TMUs19248
Ray Tracing Coresno data6
L1 Cache1.1 MB1.1 MB
L2 Cache3 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options4x-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.2-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD80−85
+122%
36
−122%
1440p35−40
+106%
17
−106%
4K18−21
+100%
9
−100%

Cost per frame, $

1080p12.49no data
1440p28.54no data
4K55.50no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+0%
27
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+0%
19
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50
+0%
50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+0%
16
+0%
Dota 2 62
+0%
62
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 26
+0%
26
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+0%
43
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+0%
12
+0%
Dota 2 59
+0%
59
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 37
+0%
37
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+0%
19
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
+0%
10
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 25
+0%
25
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
+0%
11
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+0%
15
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how GTX TITAN X and Arc A350M compete in popular games:

  • GTX TITAN X is 122% faster in 1080p
  • GTX TITAN X is 106% faster in 1440p
  • GTX TITAN X is 100% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 30.03 13.02
Recency 17 March 2015 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 25 Watt

GTX TITAN X has a 130.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc A350M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX TITAN X is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A350M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX TITAN X is a desktop graphics card while Arc A350M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
GeForce GTX TITAN X
Intel Arc A350M
Arc A350M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
RTX 3050 8 GB GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
Arc A350M Arc A350M
vs
Radeon E8950 Radeon E8950
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
Arc A750 Arc A750
GTX TITAN X TITAN X
vs
GTX 980MX 980MX
GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
vs
HD 6850 HD 6850
GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
vs
Playstation 4 Slim GPU Playstation 4 Slim GPU
GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
vs
A100 PCIe 80 GB A100 PCIe 80 GB
GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
vs
RX 6800S RX 6800S
GT 720 GT 720
vs
HD Graphics 2500 HD Graphics 2500
GT 720 GT 720
vs
ATI HD 3610 HD 3610
GT 720 GT 720
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GTX 660 Rev. 2 GTX 660 Rev. 2
vs
GRID K560Q GRID K560Q
GTX 660 Rev. 2 GTX 660 Rev. 2
vs
GRID K240Q GRID K240Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 288 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 76 votes

Rate Arc A350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX TITAN X or Arc A350M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.