Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs GeForce GTX 980M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 965M 4 GB GTX 970M GTX 980 Mobile GTX 980M GTX 980MX
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon Pro 450 Radeon Pro 455 Radeon Pro 460 Radeon Pro WX 4130 Radeon Pro WX 4150 Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980M with Radeon Pro WX 4150, including specs and performance data.

GTX 980M
2014
8 GB GDDR5
19.01
+174%

GTX 980M outperforms Pro WX 4150 by a whopping 174% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 980M GTX 980M
Pro WX 4150 Pro WX 4150

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking300564
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.129.59
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGM204Baffin
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date7 October 2014 (10 years ago)1 March 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536896
Core clock speed1038 MHz1002 MHz
Boost clock speed1127 MHz1053 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown50 Watt
Texture fill rate51.8458.97
Floating-point processing power1.659 TFLOPS1.887 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs9656

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-
Ansel+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 980M 19.01
+174%
Pro WX 4150 6.95

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 980M 7352
+174%
Pro WX 4150 2687

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p173
+188%
60−65
−188%
Full HD72
+200%
24−27
−200%
1440p36
+200%
12−14
−200%
4K27
+200%
9−10
−200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+194%
16−18
−194%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+154%
12−14
−154%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+194%
16−18
−194%
Battlefield 5 82
+193%
27−30
−193%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+154%
12−14
−154%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
Far Cry 5 58
+190%
20−22
−190%
Fortnite 178
+345%
40−45
−345%
Forza Horizon 4 74
+155%
27−30
−155%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+213%
16−18
−213%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85
+254%
24−27
−254%
Valorant 130−140
+90.3%
70−75
−90.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+194%
16−18
−194%
Battlefield 5 68
+143%
27−30
−143%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+154%
12−14
−154%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230
+115%
100−110
−115%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
Dota 2 100−110
+102%
50−55
−102%
Far Cry 5 53
+165%
20−22
−165%
Fortnite 86
+115%
40−45
−115%
Forza Horizon 4 68
+134%
27−30
−134%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+213%
16−18
−213%
Grand Theft Auto V 60
+150%
24−27
−150%
Metro Exodus 31
+138%
12−14
−138%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 79
+229%
24−27
−229%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 61
+259%
16−18
−259%
Valorant 130−140
+90.3%
70−75
−90.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 61
+118%
27−30
−118%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+154%
12−14
−154%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
Dota 2 100−110
+102%
50−55
−102%
Far Cry 5 50
+150%
20−22
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 47
+62.1%
27−30
−62.1%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+213%
16−18
−213%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 49
+104%
24−27
−104%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+94.1%
16−18
−94.1%
Valorant 130−140
+90.3%
70−75
−90.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 63
+57.5%
40−45
−57.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+160%
50−55
−160%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
+275%
8−9
−275%
Metro Exodus 19
+217%
6−7
−217%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+342%
35−40
−342%
Valorant 170−180
+134%
70−75
−134%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45
+275%
12−14
−275%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Far Cry 5 34
+162%
12−14
−162%
Forza Horizon 4 39
+144%
16−18
−144%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+191%
10−12
−191%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+190%
10−11
−190%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40
+208%
12−14
−208%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
+128%
18−20
−128%
Metro Exodus 12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+450%
4−5
−450%
Valorant 100−110
+206%
30−35
−206%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 23
+360%
5−6
−360%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Dota 2 60−65
+170%
21−24
−170%
Far Cry 5 16
+129%
7−8
−129%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+160%
10−11
−160%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 17
+183%
6−7
−183%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 19
+217%
6−7
−217%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how GTX 980M and Pro WX 4150 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 980M is 188% faster in 900p
  • GTX 980M is 200% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 980M is 200% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 980M is 200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 980M is 1100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 980M is ahead in 66 tests (99%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 19.01 6.95
Recency 7 October 2014 1 March 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

GTX 980M has a 173.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro WX 4150, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 980M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4150 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
GeForce GTX 980M
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
Radeon Pro WX 4150
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 980M GeForce GTX 980M
vs
R9 M290X Crossfire Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Pro WX 4150 Radeon Pro WX 4150
vs
K4100M Quadro K4100M
GTX 980M GeForce GTX 980M
vs
RX 580 Mobile Radeon RX 580 Mobile
GTX 980M GTX 980M
vs
GTX 770M SLI GTX 770M SLI
GTX 980M GeForce GTX 980M
vs
Quadro M2200 Quadro M2200
GTX 980M GeForce GTX 980M
vs
Quadro M1200 Quadro M1200
GTX 980M GeForce GTX 980M
vs
Quadro M620 Quadro M620
GTX 980M GTX 980M
vs
GTX 460M GTX 460M
GTX 980M GeForce GTX 980M
vs
RX 550 Radeon RX 550
GTX 980M GeForce GTX 980M
vs
RX 560 Radeon RX 560
GTX 980M GTX 980M
vs
GTX 1060 3 GB GTX 1060 3 GB
GTX 980M GTX 980M
vs
GTX 660 GTX 660
GTX 980M GeForce GTX 980M
vs
E9550 MXM Radeon E9550 MXM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 342 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 21 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 980M or Radeon Pro WX 4150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.