GeForce GTX 980MX vs Radeon Pro WX 4150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking612not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.54no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameBaffinGM204
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 March 2017 (8 years ago)1 June 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8961664
Core clock speed1002 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed1053 MHz1178 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt148 Watt
Texture fill rate58.97122.5
Floating-point processing power1.887 TFLOPS3.92 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs56104
L1 Cache224 KB624 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2017 1 June 2016
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 148 Watt

Pro WX 4150 has an age advantage of 9 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 196% lower power consumption.

GTX 980MX, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 4150 and GeForce GTX 980MX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 980MX is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
Radeon Pro WX 4150
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980MX
GeForce GTX 980MX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 25 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 28 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 4150 or GeForce GTX 980MX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.