Radeon Pro 5300M vs GeForce GTX 980M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 980M
2014
8 GB GDDR5
18.99
+23.1%

GeForce GTX 980M outperforms Radeon Pro 5300M by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking275322
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.823.65
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGM204Navi 14
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date7 October 2014 (9 years ago)13 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price$583 $2068

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 980M has 169% better value for money than Pro 5300M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15361280
CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed1038 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1127 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown65 Watt
Texture fill rate51.84100.0
Floating-point performance3,462 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 980M and Radeon Pro 5300M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+no data
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
BatteryBoost+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980M 18.99
+23.1%
Pro 5300M 15.43

GeForce GTX 980M outperforms Radeon Pro 5300M by 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 980M 7341
+23%
Pro 5300M 5966

GeForce GTX 980M outperforms Radeon Pro 5300M by 23% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p173
+23.6%
140−150
−23.6%
Full HD72
+30.9%
55−60
−30.9%
1440p35
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
4K29
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 51
+59.4%
30−35
−59.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+23.1%
24−27
−23.1%
Battlefield 5 67
+34%
50−55
−34%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+24.2%
30−35
−24.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Far Cry 5 62
+47.6%
40−45
−47.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 59
+37.2%
40−45
−37.2%
Forza Horizon 4 74
+42.3%
50−55
−42.3%
Hitman 3 45−50
+25%
35−40
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+24%
50−55
−24%
Metro Exodus 65
+38.3%
45−50
−38.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+20.9%
40−45
−20.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+25.6%
40−45
−25.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+25%
27−30
−25%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 44
+37.5%
30−35
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+23.1%
24−27
−23.1%
Battlefield 5 57
+14%
50−55
−14%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+24.2%
30−35
−24.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+16.7%
40−45
−16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 51
+18.6%
40−45
−18.6%
Forza Horizon 4 68
+30.8%
50−55
−30.8%
Hitman 3 45−50
+25%
35−40
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+24%
50−55
−24%
Metro Exodus 56
+19.1%
45−50
−19.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+20.9%
40−45
−20.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20
−115%
40−45
+115%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 61
+90.6%
30−35
−90.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+25%
27−30
−25%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 26
−23.1%
30−35
+23.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+23.1%
24−27
−23.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+24.2%
30−35
−24.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Far Cry 5 38
−10.5%
40−45
+10.5%
Forza Horizon 4 47
−10.6%
50−55
+10.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+24%
50−55
−24%
Metro Exodus 51
+8.5%
45−50
−8.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+3.1%
30−35
−3.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+25%
27−30
−25%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+20.9%
40−45
−20.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 33
+10%
30−33
−10%
Far Cry New Dawn 35
+20.7%
27−30
−20.7%
Hitman 3 27−30
+27.3%
21−24
−27.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20
+25%
16−18
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+26.3%
18−20
−26.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 34
+36%
24−27
−36%
Forza Horizon 4 39
+30%
30−33
−30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+25.8%
30−35
−25.8%
Metro Exodus 38
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+35.7%
27−30
−35.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 35−40
+15.2%
30−35
−15.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 18
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Hitman 3 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+23.5%
16−18
−23.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Battlefield 5 23
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+23.5%
16−18
−23.5%
Metro Exodus 20
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%

This is how GTX 980M and Pro 5300M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 980M is 24% faster in 900p
  • GTX 980M is 31% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 980M is 30% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 980M is 38% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 980M is 91% faster.
  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 5300M is 115% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 980M is ahead in 68 tests (94%)
  • Pro 5300M is ahead in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.99 15.43
Recency 7 October 2014 13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

The GeForce GTX 980M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5300M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
GeForce GTX 980M
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 318 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 162 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.