Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

GTX 980 Ti
35.66
+106%

GeForce GTX 980 Ti outperforms Quadro T1000 Max-Q by 106% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking129288
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money4.14no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGM200N19P-Q1
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date2 June 2015 (8 years old)27 May 2019 (4 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data
Current price$1195 (1.8x MSRP)no data
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816768
CUDA cores2816no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz795 / 1230 MHz
Boost clock speed1075 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt35 - 40 Watt
Texture fill rate176 billion/sec75.60
Floating-point performance6,060 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 980 Ti and Quadro T1000 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length10.5" (26.7 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors6-pin + 8-pinNone
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 Ti 35.66
+106%
T1000 Max-Q 17.33

GeForce GTX 980 Ti outperforms Quadro T1000 Max-Q by 106% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 980 Ti 13822
+106%
T1000 Max-Q 6716

GeForce GTX 980 Ti outperforms Quadro T1000 Max-Q by 106% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD101
+124%
45−50
−124%
1440p49
+133%
21−24
−133%
4K50
+108%
24−27
−108%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+130%
27−30
−130%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+80.6%
35−40
−80.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+107%
30−33
−107%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+79.7%
55−60
−79.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
+116%
45−50
−116%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+130%
27−30
−130%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+97.8%
45−50
−97.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+87.2%
45−50
−87.2%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+85%
60−65
−85%
Hitman 3 110−120
+131%
45−50
−131%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+108%
35−40
−108%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+96.6%
27−30
−96.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+130%
35−40
−130%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+103%
30−35
−103%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+80.6%
35−40
−80.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+107%
30−33
−107%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+79.7%
55−60
−79.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 38
−18.4%
45−50
+18.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+130%
27−30
−130%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+97.8%
45−50
−97.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+87.2%
45−50
−87.2%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+85%
60−65
−85%
Hitman 3 110−120
+131%
45−50
−131%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+108%
35−40
−108%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+133%
27−30
−133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+96.6%
27−30
−96.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
−12.1%
35−40
+12.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+138%
35−40
−138%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+103%
30−35
−103%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 46
+27.8%
35−40
−27.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+107%
30−33
−107%
Battlefield 5 94
+59.3%
55−60
−59.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+130%
27−30
−130%
Far Cry 5 77
+67.4%
45−50
−67.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+87.2%
45−50
−87.2%
Forza Horizon 4 72
+20%
60−65
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+59.5%
35−40
−59.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+103%
30−35
−103%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 54
+108%
24−27
−108%
Hitman 3 65−70
+132%
27−30
−132%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+113%
21−24
−113%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+144%
16−18
−144%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+115%
12−14
−115%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+136%
21−24
−136%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+117%
18−20
−117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+160%
14−16
−160%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+100%
35−40
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+124%
27−30
−124%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+106%
30−35
−106%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+121%
30−35
−121%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+172%
18−20
−172%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+182%
10−12
−182%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
+167%
12−14
−167%
Hitman 3 35−40
+119%
16−18
−119%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+136%
10−12
−136%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 23
+109%
10−12
−109%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+159%
16−18
−159%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18
+80%
10−11
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Battlefield 5 40
+111%
18−20
−111%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Far Cry 5 30
+114%
14−16
−114%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+118%
16−18
−118%
Forza Horizon 4 42
+75%
24−27
−75%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%

This is how GTX 980 Ti and T1000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 980 Ti is 124% faster than T1000 Max-Q

1440p resolution:

  • GTX 980 Ti is 133% faster than T1000 Max-Q

4K resolution:

  • GTX 980 Ti is 108% faster than T1000 Max-Q

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 980 Ti is 267% faster than the T1000 Max-Q.
  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T1000 Max-Q is 18.4% faster than the GTX 980 Ti.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 980 Ti is ahead in 66 tests (97%)
  • T1000 Max-Q is ahead in 2 tests (3%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 35.66 17.33
Recency 2 June 2015 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 35 Watt

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980 Ti is a desktop card while Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 Max-Q

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1342 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 16 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.