Arc Graphics 130V vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980 Ti with Arc Graphics 130V, including specs and performance data.

GTX 980 Ti
2015
6 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
35.90
+202%

GTX 980 Ti outperforms Arc Graphics 130V by a whopping 202% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking137411
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.41no data
Power efficiency9.90no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Xe² (2025)
GPU code nameGM200Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 June 2015 (9 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28167
Core clock speed1000 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1075 MHz1850 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate189.4no data
Floating-point processing power6.06 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs176no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2no data
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 Ti 35.90
+202%
Arc Graphics 130V 11.87

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 980 Ti 13796
+202%
Arc Graphics 130V 4562

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 980 Ti 23057
+142%
Arc Graphics 130V 9523

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 980 Ti 16961
+105%
Arc Graphics 130V 8255

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD99
+209%
32
−209%
1440p51
+219%
16−18
−219%
4K53
+231%
16−18
−231%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.56no data
1440p12.73no data
4K12.25no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+78%
41
−78%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+217%
24−27
−217%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+154%
35−40
−154%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+135%
31
−135%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+217%
24−27
−217%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+139%
71
−139%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+197%
30−35
−197%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+175%
30−35
−175%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+140%
30−33
−140%
Valorant 140−150
+204%
45−50
−204%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+154%
35−40
−154%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+161%
28
−161%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+217%
24−27
−217%
Dota 2 23
−78.3%
41
+78.3%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+232%
28
−232%
Fortnite 160−170
+137%
65−70
−137%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+193%
58
−193%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+197%
30−35
−197%
Grand Theft Auto V 34
−23.5%
40−45
+23.5%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+175%
30−35
−175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+117%
85−90
−117%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+140%
30−33
−140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+38.9%
35−40
−38.9%
Valorant 140−150
+204%
45−50
−204%
World of Tanks 270−280
+71.2%
160−170
−71.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 73
+87.2%
35−40
−87.2%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+192%
25
−192%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+217%
24−27
−217%
Dota 2 110−120
+229%
35−40
−229%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+102%
45−50
−102%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+254%
48
−254%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+197%
30−35
−197%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+117%
85−90
−117%
Valorant 140−150
+204%
45−50
−204%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 65−70
+306%
16−18
−306%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+288%
16−18
−288%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+218%
55−60
−218%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+250%
10−11
−250%
World of Tanks 220−230
+173%
80−85
−173%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+196%
21−24
−196%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+250%
10−11
−250%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+326%
27−30
−326%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+264%
27−30
−264%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+228%
18−20
−228%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+229%
24−27
−229%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+275%
16−18
−275%
Valorant 100−110
+276%
27−30
−276%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+53.3%
14−16
−53.3%
Dota 2 79
+259%
21−24
−259%
Grand Theft Auto V 79
+259%
21−24
−259%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+235%
30−35
−235%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+259%
21−24
−259%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30
+173%
10−12
−173%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+53.3%
14−16
−53.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Dota 2 132
+230%
40−45
−230%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+247%
14−16
−247%
Fortnite 45−50
+277%
12−14
−277%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+263%
16−18
−263%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+267%
9−10
−267%
Valorant 55−60
+367%
12−14
−367%

This is how GTX 980 Ti and Arc Graphics 130V compete in popular games:

  • GTX 980 Ti is 209% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 980 Ti is 219% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 980 Ti is 231% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 980 Ti is 367% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc Graphics 130V is 78% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 980 Ti is ahead in 53 tests (96%)
  • Arc Graphics 130V is ahead in 2 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.90 11.87
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm

GTX 980 Ti has a 202.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 130V, on the other hand, has a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 130V in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980 Ti is a desktop card while Arc Graphics 130V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
Arc Graphics 130V

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1640 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 8 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.