Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 950 with Quadro T1000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

GTX 950
2015
2 GB GDDR5, 90 Watt
13.86

T1000 Max-Q outperforms GTX 950 by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking375314
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.76no data
Power efficiency10.5723.95
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM206TU117
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date20 August 2015 (9 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768896
Core clock speed1024 MHz765 MHz
Boost clock speed1188 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate57.0275.60
Floating-point processing power1.825 TFLOPS2.419 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs4856

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length202 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)350 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6.6 GB/s1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth105.6 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 950 13.86
T1000 Max-Q 17.45
+25.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 950 5338
T1000 Max-Q 6722
+25.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50
−20%
60−65
+20%
4K21
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.18no data
4K7.57no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−21.9%
35−40
+21.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−31.8%
27−30
+31.8%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−26.7%
55−60
+26.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−28.1%
40−45
+28.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−23.7%
45−50
+23.7%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−22.2%
110−120
+22.2%
Hitman 3 24−27
−26.9%
30−35
+26.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−21.1%
85−90
+21.1%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−30.4%
60−65
+30.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−23.7%
45−50
+23.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−26.7%
55−60
+26.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−13.3%
85−90
+13.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−21.9%
35−40
+21.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−31.8%
27−30
+31.8%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−26.7%
55−60
+26.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−28.1%
40−45
+28.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−23.7%
45−50
+23.7%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−22.2%
110−120
+22.2%
Hitman 3 24−27
−26.9%
30−35
+26.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−21.1%
85−90
+21.1%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−30.4%
60−65
+30.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−23.7%
45−50
+23.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−26.7%
55−60
+26.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 108
+170%
40−45
−170%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−13.3%
85−90
+13.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−21.9%
35−40
+21.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−31.8%
27−30
+31.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−28.1%
40−45
+28.1%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−22.2%
110−120
+22.2%
Hitman 3 24−27
−26.9%
30−35
+26.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−21.1%
85−90
+21.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−26.7%
55−60
+26.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−13.3%
85−90
+13.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−23.7%
45−50
+23.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−25.9%
30−35
+25.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−26.7%
18−20
+26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−25%
20−22
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−34.3%
90−95
+34.3%
Hitman 3 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−33.3%
30−35
+33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−41.7%
30−35
+41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−35.7%
18−20
+35.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−22.1%
100−110
+22.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−26.1%
27−30
+26.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−30.8%
16−18
+30.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Hitman 3 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−30.9%
85−90
+30.9%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−30.8%
16−18
+30.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%

This is how GTX 950 and T1000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • T1000 Max-Q is 20% faster in 1080p
  • T1000 Max-Q is 14% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 950 is 170% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1000 Max-Q is 90% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 950 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • T1000 Max-Q is ahead in 71 test (99%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.86 17.45
Recency 20 August 2015 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 50 Watt

T1000 Max-Q has a 25.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 950 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 950 is a desktop card while Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GeForce GTX 950
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2122 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 18 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.