GF117 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980 Ti and GF117, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 980 Ti
2015
6 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
35.76
+2401%

GTX 980 Ti outperforms GF117 by a whopping 2401% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking123953
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.311.55
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGM200GF117
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 June 2015 (9 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data
Current price$1195 (1.8x MSRP)$70

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 980 Ti has 178% better value for money than GF117.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores281696
CUDA cores2816no data
Core clock speed1000 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1075 MHzno data
Number of transistors8,000 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate176 billion/secno data
Floating-point performance6,060 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length10.5" (26.7 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors6-pin + 8-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2no data
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data
PureVideo HDno dataVP5

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 Ti 35.76
+2401%
GF117 1.43

GeForce GTX 980 Ti outperforms GF117 by 2401% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 980 Ti 13810
+2393%
GF117 554

GeForce GTX 980 Ti outperforms GF117 by 2393% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD101
+2425%
4−5
−2425%
1440p52
+2500%
2−3
−2500%
4K52
+2500%
2−3
−2500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1550−1600
+2400%
60−65
−2400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1600−1650
+2400%
60−65
−2400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1550−1600
+2400%
60−65
−2400%
Battlefield 5 2900−2950
+2400%
110−120
−2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1800−1850
+2366%
70−75
−2366%
Cyberpunk 2077 1550−1600
+2400%
60−65
−2400%
Far Cry 5 1950−2000
+2368%
75−80
−2368%
Far Cry New Dawn 2250−2300
+2400%
90−95
−2400%
Forza Horizon 4 3500−3550
+2400%
140−150
−2400%
Hitman 3 1850−1900
+2400%
70−75
−2400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3600−3650
+2400%
140−150
−2400%
Metro Exodus 2650−2700
+2400%
100−110
−2400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2200−2250
+2400%
85−90
−2400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3400−3450
+2400%
130−140
−2400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2250−2300
+2373%
90−95
−2373%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1600−1650
+2400%
60−65
−2400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1550−1600
+2400%
60−65
−2400%
Battlefield 5 1150−1200
+2347%
47
−2347%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1800−1850
+2366%
70−75
−2366%
Cyberpunk 2077 1550−1600
+2400%
60−65
−2400%
Far Cry 5 1950−2000
+2368%
75−80
−2368%
Far Cry New Dawn 900−950
+2400%
36
−2400%
Forza Horizon 4 3500−3550
+2400%
140−150
−2400%
Hitman 3 1850−1900
+2400%
70−75
−2400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3600−3650
+2400%
140−150
−2400%
Metro Exodus 1200−1250
+2349%
49
−2349%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2200−2250
+2400%
85−90
−2400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3400−3450
+2400%
130−140
−2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2200−2250
+2400%
85−90
−2400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2250−2300
+2373%
90−95
−2373%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1150−1200
+2400%
46
−2400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1550−1600
+2400%
60−65
−2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1800−1850
+2366%
70−75
−2366%
Cyberpunk 2077 1550−1600
+2400%
60−65
−2400%
Far Cry 5 1950−2000
+2368%
75−80
−2368%
Forza Horizon 4 1800−1850
+2400%
72
−2400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3600−3650
+2400%
140−150
−2400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3400−3450
+2400%
130−140
−2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1450−1500
+2358%
59
−2358%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2250−2300
+2373%
90−95
−2373%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2200−2250
+2400%
85−90
−2400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1700−1750
+2400%
65−70
−2400%
Far Cry New Dawn 1650−1700
+2400%
66
−2400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 950−1000
+2400%
35−40
−2400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 950−1000
+2336%
35−40
−2336%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1300−1350
+2353%
50−55
−2353%
Cyberpunk 2077 650−700
+2307%
27−30
−2307%
Far Cry 5 1600−1650
+2400%
60−65
−2400%
Forza Horizon 4 1850−1900
+2400%
70−75
−2400%
Hitman 3 1100−1150
+2344%
45−50
−2344%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1900−1950
+2368%
75−80
−2368%
Metro Exodus 1650−1700
+2363%
65−70
−2363%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2100−2150
+2371%
85−90
−2371%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1250−1300
+2400%
50−55
−2400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 750−800
+2319%
30−35
−2319%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1500−1550
+2359%
60−65
−2359%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 750−800
+2400%
30
−2400%
Far Cry New Dawn 700−750
+2314%
29
−2314%
Hitman 3 700−750
+2314%
27−30
−2314%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1100−1150
+2400%
40−45
−2400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 550−600
+2291%
23
−2291%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1100−1150
+2400%
44
−2400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 450−500
+2400%
18
−2400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 550−600
+2400%
21−24
−2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 550−600
+2400%
21−24
−2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 270−280
+2355%
10−12
−2355%
Far Cry 5 500−550
+2281%
21−24
−2281%
Forza Horizon 4 1050−1100
+2400%
42
−2400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1100−1150
+2400%
40−45
−2400%
Metro Exodus 900−950
+2332%
35−40
−2332%
Watch Dogs: Legion 450−500
+2400%
18−20
−2400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 750−800
+2319%
30−35
−2319%

This is how GTX 980 Ti and GF117 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 980 Ti is 2425% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 980 Ti is 2500% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 980 Ti is 2500% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.76 1.43

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GF117 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
NVIDIA GF117
GF117

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1425 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 10 votes

Rate GF117 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.