Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
9800 GTX+ vs GTX 980 SLI Mobile
- Interface
- Core clock speed 1126
- Max video memory 2x 8192 MB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 3500
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
- Core clock speed 738
- Max video memory 512 MB
- Memory type GDDR3
- Memory clock speed 1100MHz
- Maximum resolution
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 86 | 934 |
Value for money | 71.19 | 0.03 |
Architecture | Maxwell (2014−2018) | Tesla (2006−2010) |
GPU code name | N16E-GXX SLI | G92B |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 22 September 2015 (7 years old) | 16 January 2009 (14 years old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $229 |
Current price | $301 | $186 (0.8x MSRP) |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4096 | 128 |
CUDA cores | no data | 128 |
Core clock speed | 1126 MHz | 738 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1228 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 10400 Million | 754 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 330 Watt | 141 Watt |
Maximum GPU temperature | no data | 105 °C |
Texture fill rate | no data | 47.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | no data | 470.0 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile and GeForce 9800 GTX+ compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | large | no data |
Interface | no data | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | no data | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Height | no data | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Width | no data | 2-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | 2x 6-pin |
SLI options | + | + |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 8 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3500 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 70.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | no data |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | no data | HDTVDual Link DVI |
Multi monitor support | no data | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | no data | 2048x1536 |
G-SYNC support | + | no data |
Audio input for HDMI | no data | S/PDIF |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12_1 | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | no data | 4.0 |
OpenGL | no data | 2.1 |
OpenCL | no data | 1.1 |
Vulkan | no data | N/A |
CUDA | + | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 136 | no data |
4K | 64 | no data |
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 65−70 | no data |
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 65−70 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 65−70 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 110−120 | no data |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 100−110 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 65−70 | no data |
Far Cry 5 | 85−90 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 85−90 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120 | no data |
Hitman 3 | 120−130 | no data |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 80−85 | no data |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 60−65 | no data |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 85−90 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 70−75 | no data |
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 65−70 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 65−70 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 110−120 | no data |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 100−110 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 65−70 | no data |
Far Cry 5 | 85−90 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 85−90 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120 | no data |
Hitman 3 | 120−130 | no data |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 80−85 | no data |
Metro Exodus | 65−70 | no data |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 60−65 | no data |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 85−90 | no data |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 132 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 70−75 | no data |
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 65−70 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 65−70 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 110−120 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 65−70 | no data |
Far Cry 5 | 85−90 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 85−90 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120 | no data |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 74 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 70−75 | no data |
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 60−65 | no data |
Hitman 3 | 70−75 | no data |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 50−55 | no data |
Metro Exodus | 40−45 | no data |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−33 | no data |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 55−60 | no data |
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 40−45 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 40−45 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 80−85 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30 | no data |
Far Cry 5 | 65−70 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 65−70 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 80−85 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35 | no data |
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 30−35 | no data |
Hitman 3 | 35−40 | no data |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 27−30 | no data |
Metro Exodus | 24−27 | no data |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 20−22 | no data |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30−33 | no data |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 51 | no data |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 24−27 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21−24 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 45−50 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14 | no data |
Far Cry 5 | 35−40 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 35−40 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 18−20 | no data |
All in all, in popular games:
- GTX 980 SLI Mobile is ahead in 0 tests (0%)
- 9800 GTX+ is ahead in 0 tests (0%)
- there's a draw in 0 tests (0%)
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 37.40 | 1.29 |
Recency | 22 September 2015 | 16 January 2009 |
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4096 | 128 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 330 Watt | 141 Watt |
Based on the results of synthetic and gaming tests, our recommendation leans towards the GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile due to its superior performance when compared to the GeForce 9800 GTX+ graphics card.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce 9800 GTX+ is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.