GeForce 9600 GT vs GTX 980 SLI Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile with GeForce 9600 GT, including specs and performance data.

GTX 980 SLI Mobile
2015
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 330 Watt
37.88
+3057%

GTX 980 SLI Mobile outperforms 9600 GT by a whopping 3057% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1161044
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.06
Power efficiency8.210.90
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameN16E-GXX SLIG94
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 September 2015 (9 years ago)21 February 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409664
Core clock speed1126 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed1228 MHzno data
Number of transistors10400 Million505 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)330 Watt96 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rateno data20.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.208 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno data16x PCI-E 2.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options++

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed3500 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data57.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataHDTVTwo Dual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130
+3150%
4−5
−3150%
4K69
+3350%
2−3
−3350%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data44.75
4Kno data89.50

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+4000%
2−3
−4000%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+4100%
2−3
−4100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+3367%
3−4
−3367%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+4000%
2−3
−4000%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+4100%
2−3
−4100%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+3083%
6−7
−3083%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+3267%
3−4
−3267%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+4600%
2−3
−4600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+3750%
2−3
−3750%
Valorant 150−160
+3825%
4−5
−3825%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+3367%
3−4
−3367%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+4000%
2−3
−4000%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+4100%
2−3
−4100%
Dota 2 120−130
+4000%
3−4
−4000%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+3133%
3−4
−3133%
Fortnite 170−180
+3340%
5−6
−3340%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+3083%
6−7
−3083%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+3267%
3−4
−3267%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
+3967%
3−4
−3967%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+4600%
2−3
−4600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+3250%
6−7
−3250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+3750%
2−3
−3750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 141
+3425%
4−5
−3425%
Valorant 150−160
+3825%
4−5
−3825%
World of Tanks 270−280
+3388%
8−9
−3388%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+3367%
3−4
−3367%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+4000%
2−3
−4000%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+4100%
2−3
−4100%
Dota 2 120−130
+4000%
3−4
−4000%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+3133%
3−4
−3133%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+3083%
6−7
−3083%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+3267%
3−4
−3267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+3250%
6−7
−3250%
Valorant 150−160
+3825%
4−5
−3825%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 70−75
+3550%
2−3
−3550%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+3550%
2−3
−3550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+3400%
5−6
−3400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+3800%
1−2
−3800%
World of Tanks 250−260
+3471%
7−8
−3471%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+3550%
2−3
−3550%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+3900%
1−2
−3900%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+3075%
4−5
−3075%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+3700%
3−4
−3700%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+3200%
2−3
−3200%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+4150%
2−3
−4150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+3350%
2−3
−3350%
Valorant 120−130
+4033%
3−4
−4033%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27 0−1
Dota 2 75−80
+3750%
2−3
−3750%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+3800%
2−3
−3800%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+3100%
4−5
−3100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+3750%
2−3
−3750%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+4500%
1−2
−4500%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Dota 2 75−80
+3750%
2−3
−3750%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+5700%
1−2
−5700%
Fortnite 55−60
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+3150%
2−3
−3150%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
Valorant 65−70
+3150%
2−3
−3150%

This is how GTX 980 SLI Mobile and 9600 GT compete in popular games:

  • GTX 980 SLI Mobile is 3150% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 980 SLI Mobile is 3350% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.88 1.20
Recency 22 September 2015 21 February 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 330 Watt 96 Watt

GTX 980 SLI Mobile has a 3056.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

9600 GT, on the other hand, has 243.8% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9600 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce 9600 GT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
GeForce 9600 GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 70 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 2062 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.