GeForce 9400 GT PCI vs GTX 980 SLI Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking147not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.41no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameN16E-GXX SLIG96C
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 September 2015 (9 years ago)27 August 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409616
Core clock speed1126 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed1228 MHzno data
Number of transistors10400 Million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)330 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4.400
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0448 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCI
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed3500 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
G-SYNC support+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 September 2015 27 August 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 330 Watt 50 Watt

GTX 980 SLI Mobile has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

9400 GT PCI, on the other hand, has 560% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile and GeForce 9400 GT PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 9400 GT PCI is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI
GeForce 9400 GT PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 70 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 37 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile or GeForce 9400 GT PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.