FirePro M2000 vs GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile

Place in performance ranking	109	1048
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	80.20	0.02
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	N16E-GXX SLI	Turks GLM
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	22 September 2015 (8 years ago)	1 July 2012 (12 years ago)
Current price	$301	$387

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 980 SLI Mobile has 400900% better value for money than FirePro M2000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	480
Core clock speed	1126 MHz	500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1228 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	10400 Million	716 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	330 Watt	33 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	12.00
Floating-point performance	no data	480.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile and FirePro M2000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Bus support	no data	n/a
Interface	no data	PCIe 2.0 x16
Form factor	no data	chip-down
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2x 8 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	3500 MHz	3200 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	25.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	No outputs
G-SYNC support	+	no data
StereoOutput3D	no data	1

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	no data	5.0
OpenGL	no data	4.4
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	no data	N/A
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 SLI Mobile 38.54
+3404%

FirePro M2000 1.10

GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile outperforms FirePro M2000 by 3404% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 980 SLI Mobile 33169
+3844%

FirePro M2000 841

GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile outperforms FirePro M2000 by 3844% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 980 SLI Mobile 47704
+1106%

FirePro M2000 3956

GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile outperforms FirePro M2000 by 1106% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	300−350 +3233%	9 −3233%
Full HD	139 +672%	18 −672%
4K	68 +6700%	1−2 −6700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

65−70

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 +6600%	1−2 −6600%
Battlefield 5	120−130 +4033%	3−4 −4033%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70	no data
Far Cry 5	80−85	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100	no data
Forza Horizon 4	140−150	no data
Hitman 3	75−80	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160	no data
Metro Exodus	110−120 +3600%	3−4 −3600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	150−160	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 +6600%	1−2 −6600%
Battlefield 5	120−130 +4033%	3−4 −4033%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70	no data
Far Cry 5	80−85	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100	no data
Forza Horizon 4	140−150	no data
Hitman 3	75−80	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160	no data
Metro Exodus	110−120 +3600%	3−4 −3600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	150−160	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	132	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 +6600%	1−2 −6600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70	no data
Far Cry 5	80−85	no data
Forza Horizon 4	140−150	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	150−160	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	74	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

90−95

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	90−95	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +4100%	1−2 −4100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33	no data
Far Cry 5	70−75	no data
Forza Horizon 4	80−85	no data
Hitman 3	50−55	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85	no data
Metro Exodus	70−75 +3500%	2−3 −3500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 +4550%	2−3 −4550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35	0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +3800%	1−2 −3800%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35	no data
Hitman 3	30−35	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	51 +5000%	1−2 −5000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14	0−1
Far Cry 5	21−24	no data
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +5200%	1−2 −5200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50	no data
Metro Exodus	40−45	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20	0−1