Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 970M SLI

#ad
Buy on Amazon
SLI
VS

Aggregated performance score

GTX 970M SLI
2014
2x 6144 MB GDDR5
24.21
+1.6%

GeForce GTX 970M SLI outperforms Quadro P3200 Max-Q by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking211214
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.87no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameno dataGP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date7 October 2014 (9 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Current price$1326 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601792
Core clock speed924 MHz1139 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHz1404 MHz
Number of transistors2x 5200 Million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)162 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data157.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 970M SLI and Quadro P3200 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 6 GB6 GB
Memory bus width2x 192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz7012 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data168.3 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno data1.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD88
+3.5%
85−90
−3.5%
4K39
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+5.3%
75−80
−5.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+5%
60−65
−5%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+8%
75−80
−8%
Hitman 3 70−75
+2.9%
70−75
−2.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+4%
50−55
−4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+6%
50−55
−6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+5.3%
75−80
−5.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+5%
60−65
−5%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+8%
75−80
−8%
Hitman 3 70−75
+2.9%
70−75
−2.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+4%
50−55
−4%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+6%
50−55
−6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+6.3%
80−85
−6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+5.3%
75−80
−5.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+5%
60−65
−5%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+8%
75−80
−8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Hitman 3 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Hitman 3 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

This is how GTX 970M SLI and P3200 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 970M SLI is 3.5% faster than P3200 Max-Q in 1080p
  • GTX 970M SLI is 11.4% faster than P3200 Max-Q in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.21 23.82
Recency 7 October 2014 21 February 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 162 Watt 75 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 970M SLI and Quadro P3200 Max-Q.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 970M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M SLI
GeForce GTX 970M SLI
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 45 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 970M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 17 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.