Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 965M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 965M SLI with Quadro P3200 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

GTX 965M SLI
2015
2x 4 GB GDDR5
15.79

P3200 Max-Q outperforms 965M SLI by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking368292
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.22
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameno dataGP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date5 January 2015 (10 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481792
Core clock speed924 MHz1139 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz1404 MHz
Number of transistors2x 5200 Million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data157.2
Floating-point processing powerno data5.032 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data112
L1 Cacheno data672 KB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz1753 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data168.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD72
−31.9%
95−100
+31.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
−31.9%
120−130
+31.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−32.4%
45−50
+32.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 65−70
−30.4%
90−95
+30.4%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
−31.9%
120−130
+31.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−32.4%
45−50
+32.4%
Escape from Tarkov 65−70
−30.8%
85−90
+30.8%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−34.6%
70−75
+34.6%
Fortnite 85−90
−34.8%
120−130
+34.8%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−36.4%
90−95
+36.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−33.3%
80−85
+33.3%
Valorant 120−130
−31.8%
170−180
+31.8%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 65−70
−30.4%
90−95
+30.4%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
−31.9%
120−130
+31.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
−34%
280−290
+34%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−32.4%
45−50
+32.4%
Dota 2 95−100
−32.7%
130−140
+32.7%
Escape from Tarkov 65−70
−30.8%
85−90
+30.8%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−34.6%
70−75
+34.6%
Fortnite 85−90
−34.8%
120−130
+34.8%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−36.4%
90−95
+36.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
−33.3%
80−85
+33.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−32.4%
45−50
+32.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−33.3%
80−85
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−27.9%
55−60
+27.9%
Valorant 120−130
−31.8%
170−180
+31.8%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
−30.4%
90−95
+30.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−32.4%
45−50
+32.4%
Dota 2 95−100
−32.7%
130−140
+32.7%
Escape from Tarkov 65−70
−30.8%
85−90
+30.8%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−34.6%
70−75
+34.6%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−36.4%
90−95
+36.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−33.3%
80−85
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−27.9%
55−60
+27.9%
Valorant 120−130
−31.8%
170−180
+31.8%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
−34.8%
120−130
+34.8%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
−35.6%
160−170
+35.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−34.6%
210−220
+34.6%
Valorant 160−170
−31.3%
210−220
+31.3%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
−33.3%
60−65
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−28.6%
45−50
+28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−28.2%
50−55
+28.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
−25%
45−50
+25%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Valorant 85−90
−34.8%
120−130
+34.8%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Dota 2 55−60
−31.6%
75−80
+31.6%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%

This is how GTX 965M SLI and P3200 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • P3200 Max-Q is 32% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.79 21.70
Recency 5 January 2015 21 February 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm

P3200 Max-Q has a 37.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 965M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 965M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
GeForce GTX 965M SLI
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 965M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 27 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 965M SLI or Quadro P3200 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.