UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) vs GeForce GTX 965M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 965M and UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 965M
2015
4 GB GDDR5
9.81

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms GTX 965M by an impressive 60% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking423319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.97no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)no data
GPU code nameN16E-GS, N16E-GRRocket Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2015 (9 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$1546 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed944 MHzno data
Boost clock speed950 / 1151 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown15 Watt
Texture fill rate73.60no data
Floating-point performance2,355 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 965M and UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+no data
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
BatteryBoost+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.1no data
Vulkan1.1no data
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 965M 9.81
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 15.70
+60%

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms GeForce GTX 965M by 60% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 965M 7322
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 11485
+56.9%

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms GeForce GTX 965M by 57% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 965M 23562
+1233%
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 1768

GeForce GTX 965M outperforms UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) by 1233% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 965M 5536
+243%
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 1613

GeForce GTX 965M outperforms UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) by 243% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 965M 34748
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 83293
+140%

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms GeForce GTX 965M by 140% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 965M 66
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 9013
+13494%

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms GeForce GTX 965M by 13494% in Unigine Heaven 3.0.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD47
+236%
14
−236%
1440p26
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%
4K21
−42.9%
30−35
+42.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 31 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16 no data
Battlefield 5 49 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 47 no data
Hitman 3 18−20 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 46 no data
Metro Exodus 30−33 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 45 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16 no data
Battlefield 5 37 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 29 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Hitman 3 18−20 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 18 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 36 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 13 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 28 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 23 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 32 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 22 no data
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 no data
Hitman 3 12−14 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 18 no data
Metro Exodus 14−16 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8 no data
Hitman 3 6−7 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 9 no data
Metro Exodus 31 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10 no data

This is how GTX 965M and UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) compete in popular games:

  • GTX 965M is 236% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is 54% faster in 1440p
  • UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is 43% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.81 15.70
Recency 5 January 2015 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 965M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
GeForce GTX 965M
Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 106 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 965M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 95 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.