Arc Graphics 140V vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and Arc Graphics 140V, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
2021
15 Watt
14.09
+4.8%

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms Arc Graphics 140V by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking372383
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency64.75no data
Architectureno dataXe² (2025)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data8
Boost clock speedno data2050 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataLPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Shared memory-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12_2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 14.09
+4.8%
Arc Graphics 140V 13.45

  • Other tests
    • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
    • 3DMark Vantage Performance
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
    • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 11485
+7.5%
Arc Graphics 140V 10688

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 1768
Arc Graphics 140V 39055
+2109%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 1613
Arc Graphics 140V 9492
+488%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 83293
+57.1%
Arc Graphics 140V 53014

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12
−233%
40
+233%
1440p18−21
−11.1%
20
+11.1%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−87.5%
45
+87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Elden Ring 40−45
+4.9%
40−45
−4.9%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+4.5%
40−45
−4.5%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−54.2%
37
+54.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 14
−457%
78
+457%
Metro Exodus 10
−270%
35−40
+270%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+2.9%
30−35
−2.9%
Valorant 55−60
+5.6%
50−55
−5.6%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+4.5%
40−45
−4.5%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−25%
30
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Dota 2 13
−238%
44
+238%
Elden Ring 40−45
+4.9%
40−45
−4.9%
Far Cry 5 18
−94.4%
35
+94.4%
Fortnite 75−80
+3.9%
75−80
−3.9%
Forza Horizon 4 12
−442%
65
+442%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
−617%
43
+617%
Metro Exodus 7
−429%
35−40
+429%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+3%
95−100
−3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+2.9%
30−35
−2.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+4.9%
40−45
−4.9%
Valorant 55−60
+5.6%
50−55
−5.6%
World of Tanks 180−190
+3.9%
170−180
−3.9%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+4.5%
40−45
−4.5%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−4.2%
25
+4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Dota 2 25
+19%
21−24
−19%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+3.9%
50−55
−3.9%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
57
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+3%
95−100
−3%
Valorant 55−60
+5.6%
50−55
−5.6%
Dota 2 20−22
+11.1%
18
−11.1%
Elden Ring 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+6.4%
110−120
−6.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
World of Tanks 95−100
+4.2%
95−100
−4.2%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+129%
14
−129%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+6.5%
30−35
−6.5%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+6.3%
30−35
−6.3%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+3.4%
27−30
−3.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Valorant 35−40
+6.1%
30−35
−6.1%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Dota 2 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Elden Ring 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+5.1%
35−40
−5.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Dota 2 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Fortnite 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
Valorant 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%

This is how UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and Arc Graphics 140V compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 140V is 233% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Graphics 140V is 11% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is 129% faster.
  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc Graphics 140V is 617% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is ahead in 38 tests (70%)
  • Arc Graphics 140V is ahead in 11 tests (20%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.09 13.45
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has a 4.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 140V, on the other hand, has a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and Arc Graphics 140V.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8
114 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4
9 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.