Arc Graphics 140V vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and Arc Graphics 140V, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms Arc Graphics 140V by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 372 | 383 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 64.75 | no data |
Architecture | no data | Xe² (2025) |
GPU code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | Lunar Lake iGPU |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 30 March 2021 (3 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 8 |
Boost clock speed | no data | 2050 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 3 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | no data | LPDDR5x |
Maximum RAM amount | no data | 16 GB |
Shared memory | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | no data | 12_2 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Other tests
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
- 3DMark Vantage Performance
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 12
−233%
| 40
+233%
|
1440p | 18−21
−11.1%
| 20
+11.1%
|
FPS performance in popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
−87.5%
|
45
+87.5%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+16.7%
|
24−27
−16.7%
|
Elden Ring | 40−45
+4.9%
|
40−45
−4.9%
|
Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+4.5%
|
40−45
−4.5%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
−54.2%
|
37
+54.2%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+16.7%
|
24−27
−16.7%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 14
−457%
|
78
+457%
|
Metro Exodus | 10
−270%
|
35−40
+270%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 35−40
+2.9%
|
30−35
−2.9%
|
Valorant | 55−60
+5.6%
|
50−55
−5.6%
|
Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+4.5%
|
40−45
−4.5%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
−25%
|
30
+25%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+16.7%
|
24−27
−16.7%
|
Dota 2 | 13
−238%
|
44
+238%
|
Elden Ring | 40−45
+4.9%
|
40−45
−4.9%
|
Far Cry 5 | 18
−94.4%
|
35
+94.4%
|
Fortnite | 75−80
+3.9%
|
75−80
−3.9%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 12
−442%
|
65
+442%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 6
−617%
|
43
+617%
|
Metro Exodus | 7
−429%
|
35−40
+429%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 100−110
+3%
|
95−100
−3%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 35−40
+2.9%
|
30−35
−2.9%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
+4.9%
|
40−45
−4.9%
|
Valorant | 55−60
+5.6%
|
50−55
−5.6%
|
World of Tanks | 180−190
+3.9%
|
170−180
−3.9%
|
Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+4.5%
|
40−45
−4.5%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
−4.2%
|
25
+4.2%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+16.7%
|
24−27
−16.7%
|
Dota 2 | 25
+19%
|
21−24
−19%
|
Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+3.9%
|
50−55
−3.9%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+0%
|
57
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 100−110
+3%
|
95−100
−3%
|
Valorant | 55−60
+5.6%
|
50−55
−5.6%
|
Dota 2 | 20−22
+11.1%
|
18
−11.1%
|
Elden Ring | 21−24
+5%
|
20−22
−5%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
+5%
|
20−22
−5%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 110−120
+6.4%
|
110−120
−6.4%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
World of Tanks | 95−100
+4.2%
|
95−100
−4.2%
|
Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+3.7%
|
27−30
−3.7%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+129%
|
14
−129%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+6.5%
|
30−35
−6.5%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+6.3%
|
30−35
−6.3%
|
Metro Exodus | 30−33
+3.4%
|
27−30
−3.4%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
Valorant | 35−40
+6.1%
|
30−35
−6.1%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
Dota 2 | 24−27
+4.2%
|
24−27
−4.2%
|
Elden Ring | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
+4.2%
|
24−27
−4.2%
|
Metro Exodus | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45
+5.1%
|
35−40
−5.1%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+4.2%
|
24−27
−4.2%
|
Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+8.3%
|
12−14
−8.3%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Dota 2 | 24−27
+19%
|
21−24
−19%
|
Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+5.9%
|
16−18
−5.9%
|
Fortnite | 16−18
+6.7%
|
14−16
−6.7%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
+5.3%
|
18−20
−5.3%
|
Valorant | 14−16
+7.1%
|
14−16
−7.1%
|
This is how UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and Arc Graphics 140V compete in popular games:
- Arc Graphics 140V is 233% faster in 1080p
- Arc Graphics 140V is 11% faster in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is 129% faster.
- in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc Graphics 140V is 617% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is ahead in 38 tests (70%)
- Arc Graphics 140V is ahead in 11 tests (20%)
- there's a draw in 5 tests (9%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 14.09 | 13.45 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has a 4.8% higher aggregate performance score.
Arc Graphics 140V, on the other hand, has a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and Arc Graphics 140V.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.