Radeon RX 6500 vs GeForce GTX 965M SLI

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 965M SLI and Radeon RX 6500, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 965M SLI
2015
2x 4 GB GDDR5
17.34

RX 6500 outperforms GTX 965M SLI by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking320276
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2015 (10 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed924 MHzno data
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors2x 5200 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nmno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed5000 MHzno data
Shared memory-no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1no data
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70
−14.3%
80−85
+14.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−14.3%
60−65
+14.3%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−18.1%
85−90
+18.1%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
−17.4%
50−55
+17.4%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−17%
55−60
+17%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−12.2%
45−50
+12.2%
Valorant 70−75
−17.1%
80−85
+17.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−14.3%
60−65
+14.3%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
Dota 2 60−65
−14.5%
70−75
+14.5%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−9.8%
65−70
+9.8%
Fortnite 90−95
−13.8%
100−110
+13.8%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−18.1%
85−90
+18.1%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
−17.4%
50−55
+17.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
−14.5%
70−75
+14.5%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−14.9%
50−55
+14.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−11.6%
130−140
+11.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−12.2%
45−50
+12.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 61
−4.9%
60−65
+4.9%
Valorant 70−75
−17.1%
80−85
+17.1%
World of Tanks 210−220
−9.4%
230−240
+9.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−14.3%
60−65
+14.3%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
Dota 2 60−65
−14.5%
70−75
+14.5%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−9.8%
65−70
+9.8%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−18.1%
85−90
+18.1%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
−8.7%
50−55
+8.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−11.6%
130−140
+11.6%
Valorant 70−75
−14.3%
80−85
+14.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−22.2%
30−35
+22.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−12.5%
180−190
+12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
World of Tanks 110−120
−9.2%
130−140
+9.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−17.1%
40−45
+17.1%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−25%
55−60
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−18.2%
50−55
+18.2%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−15.4%
45−50
+15.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%
Valorant 40−45
−13.6%
50−55
+13.6%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Dota 2 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−17.2%
30−35
+17.2%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−25%
14−16
+25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−15.4%
60−65
+15.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−18.2%
12−14
+18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−17.2%
30−35
+17.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−17.6%
20−22
+17.6%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Dota 2 30−33
−13.3%
30−35
+13.3%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−18.2%
24−27
+18.2%
Fortnite 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Valorant 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how GTX 965M SLI and RX 6500 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6500 is 14% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6500 is 25% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6500 is ahead in 42 tests (79%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (21%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.34 20.34

RX 6500 has a 17.3% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon RX 6500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 965M SLI in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
GeForce GTX 965M SLI
AMD Radeon RX 6500
Radeon RX 6500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 965M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 42 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.