Radeon RX 6500 vs GeForce GTX 965M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon RX 6500, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 965M
2016
2 GB GDDR5
9.58

RX 6500 outperforms GTX 965M by a whopping 104% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking456276
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.71no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)no data
GPU code nameGM206Sno data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2016 (9 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed944 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)unknownno data
Texture fill rate73.60no data
Floating-point processing power2.355 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs64no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.1no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 965M 9.58
RX 6500 19.56
+104%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 965M 3827
RX 6500 7817
+104%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45
−100%
90−95
+100%
1440p26
−92.3%
50−55
+92.3%
4K22
−81.8%
40−45
+81.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−105%
40−45
+105%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 36
−77.8%
60−65
+77.8%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−105%
40−45
+105%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−115%
85−90
+115%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−116%
50−55
+116%
Metro Exodus 38
−97.4%
75−80
+97.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45
−4.4%
45−50
+4.4%
Valorant 35−40
−116%
80−85
+116%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40
−60%
60−65
+60%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−105%
40−45
+105%
Dota 2 28
−157%
70−75
+157%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−65.9%
65−70
+65.9%
Fortnite 59
−81.4%
100−110
+81.4%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−115%
85−90
+115%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−116%
50−55
+116%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−97.2%
70−75
+97.2%
Metro Exodus 23
−139%
55−60
+139%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 41
−232%
130−140
+232%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−80.8%
45−50
+80.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
−93.9%
60−65
+93.9%
Valorant 35−40
−116%
80−85
+116%
World of Tanks 140−150
−62.5%
230−240
+62.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 19
−237%
60−65
+237%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−105%
40−45
+105%
Dota 2 77
+6.9%
70−75
−6.9%
Far Cry 5 49
−38.8%
65−70
+38.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−115%
85−90
+115%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−100%
50−55
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 23
−491%
130−140
+491%
Valorant 35−40
−97.4%
75−80
+97.4%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−154%
30−35
+154%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−102%
95−100
+102%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
World of Tanks 70−75
−97.2%
140−150
+97.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−116%
40−45
+116%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−150%
55−60
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−141%
50−55
+141%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−100%
30−33
+100%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%
Valorant 24−27
−100%
50−55
+100%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Dota 2 20−22
−100%
40−45
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−70%
30−35
+70%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−200%
14−16
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−89.7%
55−60
+89.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−70%
30−35
+70%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−122%
20−22
+122%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Dota 2 44
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−117%
24−27
+117%
Fortnite 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
Valorant 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how GTX 965M and RX 6500 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6500 is 100% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6500 is 92% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6500 is 82% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 965M is 26% faster.
  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6500 is 491% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 965M is ahead in 2 tests (4%)
  • RX 6500 is ahead in 40 tests (75%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (21%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.58 19.56

RX 6500 has a 104.2% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon RX 6500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 965M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
GeForce GTX 965M
AMD Radeon RX 6500
Radeon RX 6500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 111 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 965M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 42 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.