HD Graphics 400 vs GeForce GTX 950M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 950M and HD Graphics 400, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 950M
2015
4 GB DDR3 or GDDR5, 75 Watt
6.53
+494%

GTX 950M outperforms HD Graphics 400 by a whopping 494% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5711085
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.1512.95
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameGM107Braswell GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 March 2015 (9 years ago)1 April 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64096
Core clock speed914 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt6 Watt
Texture fill rate44.967.200
Floating-point processing power1.439 TFLOPS0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs162
TMUs4012

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8Ring Bus
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3 or GDDR5DDR3L
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 or 2500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth32 or 80 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-
Ansel+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.3
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 950M 6.53
+494%
HD Graphics 400 1.10

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 950M 3200
+611%
HD Graphics 400 450

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD29
+625%
4−5
−625%
1440p21
+600%
3−4
−600%
4K16
+700%
2−3
−700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 18
+500%
3−4
−500%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Metro Exodus 22
+633%
3−4
−633%
Red Dead Redemption 2 48
+500%
8−9
−500%
Valorant 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Dota 2 38
+533%
6−7
−533%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+500%
5−6
−500%
Fortnite 30
+500%
5−6
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Grand Theft Auto V 20
+567%
3−4
−567%
Metro Exodus 10
+900%
1−2
−900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55
+511%
9−10
−511%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+567%
3−4
−567%
Valorant 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
World of Tanks 100−110
+550%
16−18
−550%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 15
+650%
2−3
−650%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Dota 2 67
+570%
10−11
−570%
Far Cry 5 26
+550%
4−5
−550%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 17
+750%
2−3
−750%
Valorant 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+517%
6−7
−517%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6 0−1
World of Tanks 45−50
+500%
8−9
−500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry 5 19
+533%
3−4
−533%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Valorant 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Far Cry 5 9
+800%
1−2
−800%
Fortnite 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5 0−1
Valorant 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

This is how GTX 950M and HD Graphics 400 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 950M is 625% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 950M is 600% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 950M is 700% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.53 1.10
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 6 Watt

GTX 950M has a 493.6% higher aggregate performance score.

HD Graphics 400, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1150% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 950M is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
GeForce GTX 950M
Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1131 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 950M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 419 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.