HD Graphics 400 vs Radeon HD 7650M

Place in the ranking	1077	1080
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.93	12.99
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code name	Thames	Braswell GT1
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	7 January 2012 (13 years ago)	1 April 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	480	96
Core clock speed	450 MHz	320 MHz
Boost clock speed	550 MHz	600 MHz
Number of transistors	716 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	6 Watt
Texture fill rate	10.80	7.200
Floating-point processing power	0.432 TFLOPS	0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	2
TMUs	24	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	DDR3L
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.3
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7650M 1.14
+0.9%

HD Graphics 400 1.13

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 7650M 700
+55.6%

HD Graphics 400 450

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	18 +12.5%	16−18 −12.5%
Full HD	18 +12.5%	16−18 −12.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Dota 2	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Fortnite	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
World of Tanks	24−27 +4.2%	24−27 −4.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Dota 2	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
World of Tanks	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Valorant	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Dota 2	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Valorant	1−2	0−1

This is how HD 7650M and HD Graphics 400 compete in popular games:

HD 7650M is 13% faster in 900p
HD 7650M is 13% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.14	1.13
Recency	7 January 2012	1 April 2015
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	6 Watt

HD 7650M has a 0.9% higher aggregate performance score.

HD Graphics 400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon HD 7650M and HD Graphics 400.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.