Radeon HD 7650A vs GeForce GTX 770M

Place in the ranking	545	987
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.55	0.12
Power efficiency	6.66	3.09
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	GK106	Onega
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)	5 January 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$189.99	$262

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 770M has 3692% better value for money than HD 7650A.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	960	480
Core clock speed	811 MHz	600 MHz
Boost clock speed	797 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	2,540 million	716 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	33 Watt
Texture fill rate	63.76	14.40
Floating-point processing power	1.53 TFLOPS	0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs	24	8
TMUs	80	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	1 GB
Standard memory configuration	GDDR5	no data
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96.0 GB/s	28.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200	no data
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP content protection	+	-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	+	-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support	+	-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 770M 7.24
+389%

HD 7650A 1.48

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 770M 2784
+389%

HD 7650A 569

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

49
+390%

10−12

−390%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

3.88
+576%

26.20

−576%

GTX 770M has 576% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +475%	4−5 −475%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +480%	5−6 −480%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 +467%	3−4 −467%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
Valorant	24−27 +400%	5−6 −400%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +475%	4−5 −475%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%
Dota 2	24−27 +400%	5−6 −400%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +433%	6−7 −433%
Fortnite	40−45 +438%	8−9 −438%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +480%	5−6 −480%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 +467%	3−4 −467%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 +400%	5−6 −400%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 +392%	12−14 −392%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	23 +475%	4−5 −475%
Valorant	24−27 +400%	5−6 −400%
World of Tanks	151 +403%	30−33 −403%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +475%	4−5 −475%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%
Dota 2	24−27 +400%	5−6 −400%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +433%	6−7 −433%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +480%	5−6 −480%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 +467%	3−4 −467%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 +392%	12−14 −392%
Valorant	24−27 +400%	5−6 −400%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Grand Theft Auto V	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +457%	7−8 −457%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
World of Tanks	50−55 +420%	10−11 −420%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +417%	6−7 −417%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Forza Horizon 5	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Metro Exodus	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Valorant	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2	0−1
Dota 2	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
Metro Exodus	3−4	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Counter-Strike 2	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Dota 2	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Fortnite	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Forza Horizon 5	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Valorant	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%

This is how GTX 770M and HD 7650A compete in popular games:

GTX 770M is 390% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.24	1.48
Recency	30 May 2013	5 January 2012
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	33 Watt

GTX 770M has a 389.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

HD 7650A, on the other hand, has 127.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 770M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7650A in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.