Tesla M6 vs GeForce GTX 950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 950 with Tesla M6, including specs and performance data.

GTX 950
2015
2 GB GDDR5, 90 Watt
13.83

Tesla M6 outperforms GTX 950 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking375330
Place by popularity84not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.53no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)
GPU code nameGM206GM204
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date20 August 2015 (9 years ago)30 August 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681536
CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed1024 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1188 MHz1180 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate57.02113.3
Floating-point performance1.825 gflops3.625 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length202 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotMXM Module
Recommended system power (PSU)350 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed6.6 GB/s5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth105.6 GB/s160.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA+5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 950 13.83
Tesla M6 16.29
+17.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 950 5334
Tesla M6 6284
+17.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD52
−15.4%
60−65
+15.4%
4K22
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−11.1%
100−105
+11.1%
Hitman 3 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−12.7%
80−85
+12.7%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−8.7%
50−55
+8.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−13.3%
85−90
+13.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−11.1%
100−105
+11.1%
Hitman 3 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−12.7%
80−85
+12.7%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−8.7%
50−55
+8.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 108
−11.1%
120−130
+11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−13.3%
85−90
+13.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−11.1%
100−105
+11.1%
Hitman 3 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−12.7%
80−85
+12.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−13.3%
85−90
+13.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−14.3%
80−85
+14.3%
Hitman 3 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−16.3%
100−105
+16.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hitman 3 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−17.6%
80−85
+17.6%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%

This is how GTX 950 and Tesla M6 compete in popular games:

  • Tesla M6 is 15% faster in 1080p
  • Tesla M6 is 9% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.83 16.29
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 100 Watt

GTX 950 has 11.1% lower power consumption.

Tesla M6, on the other hand, has a 17.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Tesla M6 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 950 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 950 is a desktop card while Tesla M6 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GeForce GTX 950
NVIDIA Tesla M6
Tesla M6

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2042 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 30 votes

Rate Tesla M6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.