GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs Tesla M6

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking330not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.32no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGM204GM206
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date30 August 2015 (9 years ago)1 March 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$159

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536768
Core clock speed930 MHz1026 MHz
Boost clock speed1180 MHz1190 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate113.357.12
Floating-point processing power3.625 TFLOPS1.828 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs9648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data202 mm
WidthMXM Module2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1653 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.4 GB/s105.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA5.25.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2015 1 March 2016
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 75 Watt

Tesla M6 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 950 Low Power, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M6 and GeForce GTX 950 Low Power. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla M6 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 950 Low Power is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M6
Tesla M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 30 votes

Rate Tesla M6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 8 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950 Low Power on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.