Radeon Pro SSG vs GeForce GTX 780

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780 with Radeon Pro SSG, including specs and performance data.

GTX 780
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
20.75

Pro SSG outperforms GTX 780 by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking260194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.761.09
Power efficiency6.098.03
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGK110Fiji
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)26 July 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 $9,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 780 has 337% better value for money than Pro SSG.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23044096
CUDA cores2304no data
Core clock speed863 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt260 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature95 °Cno data
Texture fill rate173.2268.8
Floating-point processing power4.156 TFLOPS8.602 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs192256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Minimum recommended system power600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM
Maximum RAM amount3 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort1x HDMI 1.4a, 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI++
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
PhysX+-
3D Vision Live+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.170
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 780 20.75
Pro SSG 28.45
+37.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 780 8003
Pro SSG 10971
+37.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD54
−29.6%
70−75
+29.6%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.75 28.45
Recency 23 May 2013 26 July 2016
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 260 Watt

GTX 780 has 4% lower power consumption.

Pro SSG, on the other hand, has a 37.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Radeon Pro SSG is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 780 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro SSG is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
GeForce GTX 780
AMD Radeon Pro SSG
Radeon Pro SSG

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1027 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 3258 votes

Rate Radeon Pro SSG on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.