Quadro M2000M vs GeForce GTX 775M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 775M with Quadro M2000M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 775M
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
9.08
+5.5%

GTX 775M outperforms M2000M by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking477496
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.5211.24
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameN13E-GTX-A2GM107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date24 September 2013 (11 years ago)3 December 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1344640
Core clock speed719 MHz1029 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1098 MHz
Number of transistors3540 Million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rateno data43.92
Floating-point processing powerno data1.405 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Interfaceno dataMXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed3600 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus++
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-+
CUDA+5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 775M 9.08
+5.5%
M2000M 8.61

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 775M 3634
+5.4%
M2000M 3448

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 775M 6071
+18%
M2000M 5143

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 775M 11906
+21.3%
M2000M 9817

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
+0%
35
+0%
4K12−14
+0%
12
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+6.9%
27−30
−6.9%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+9.1%
21−24
−9.1%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Valorant 35−40
+5.9%
30−35
−5.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+6.9%
27−30
−6.9%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Dota 2 30−35
+70%
20
−70%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+5.4%
35−40
−5.4%
Fortnite 55−60
+3.8%
50−55
−3.8%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+9.1%
21−24
−9.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+10%
30
−10%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Valorant 35−40
+5.9%
30−35
−5.9%
World of Tanks 130−140
+4.5%
130−140
−4.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+6.9%
27−30
−6.9%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Dota 2 30−35
+6.3%
30−35
−6.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+5.4%
35−40
−5.4%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+9.1%
21−24
−9.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Valorant 35−40
+5.9%
30−35
−5.9%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+4.8%
40−45
−4.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
World of Tanks 65−70
+6.3%
60−65
−6.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+10.5%
18−20
−10.5%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Valorant 24−27
+9.1%
21−24
−9.1%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+3.8%
24−27
−3.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Valorant 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how GTX 775M and M2000M compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p
  • A tie in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 775M is 70% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 775M is ahead in 52 tests (81%)
  • there's a draw in 12 tests (19%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.08 8.61
Recency 24 September 2013 3 December 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 55 Watt

GTX 775M has a 5.5% higher aggregate performance score.

M2000M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 81.8% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 775M and Quadro M2000M.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 775M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M2000M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M
GeForce GTX 775M
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Quadro M2000M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 37 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 775M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 506 votes

Rate Quadro M2000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 775M or Quadro M2000M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.