Quadro M1000M vs GeForce GTX 775M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 775M with Quadro M1000M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 775M
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
9.32
+25.6%

GTX 775M outperforms M1000M by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking441502
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.730.88
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameN13E-GTX-A2GM107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date24 September 2013 (10 years ago)2 October 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$200.89
Current price$780 $706 (3.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 775M has 97% better value for money than M1000M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1344512
Core clock speed719 MHz993 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1072 MHz
Number of transistors3540 Million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rateno data31.78
Floating-point performanceno data1,017 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 775M and Quadro M1000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
Interfaceno dataMXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB/4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed3600 MHz5000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus++
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno data+
CUDA+5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 775M 9.32
+25.6%
M1000M 7.42

GeForce GTX 775M outperforms Quadro M1000M by 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 775M 3600
+25.6%
M1000M 2867

GeForce GTX 775M outperforms Quadro M1000M by 26% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 775M 6071
+43.5%
M1000M 4230

GeForce GTX 775M outperforms Quadro M1000M by 44% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 775M 12002
+42.4%
M1000M 8429

GeForce GTX 775M outperforms Quadro M1000M by 42% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 775M 36
+50%
M1000M 24

GeForce GTX 775M outperforms Quadro M1000M by 50% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
+25%
36
−25%
4K14−16
+16.7%
12
−16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 no data
Battlefield 5 27−30 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Hitman 3 18−20 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 27−30 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 no data
Battlefield 5 27−30 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Hitman 3 18−20 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 27−30 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 no data
Hitman 3 12−14 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 no data
Metro Exodus 12−14 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8 no data
Hitman 3 5−6 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11 no data
Metro Exodus 10−11 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10 no data

This is how GTX 775M and M1000M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 775M is 25% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 775M is 17% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.32 7.42
Recency 24 September 2013 2 October 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB/4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 40 Watt

The GeForce GTX 775M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M1000M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 775M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M1000M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M
GeForce GTX 775M
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Quadro M1000M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 24 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 775M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 493 votes

Rate Quadro M1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.