UHD Graphics 750 vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 770M SLI and UHD Graphics 750, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GTX 770M SLI outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by a whopping 221% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 339 | 625 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 22.26 | 2.10 |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | no data |
| GPU code name | no data | Rocket Lake GT1 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 May 2013 (11 years ago) | 30 March 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Current price | $149 | $1454 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
GTX 770M SLI has 960% better value for money than UHD Graphics 750.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1920 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 811 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 2x 2540 Million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 20.80 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on GeForce GTX 770M SLI and UHD Graphics 750 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | no data | Ring Bus |
| SLI options | + | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 3 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 2x 192 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | no data |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | no data | 1.2 |
| CUDA | + | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+267%
|
6−7
−267%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 27−30
+155%
|
10−12
−155%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21−24
+475%
|
4−5
−475%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+327%
|
10−12
−327%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
+190%
|
10−11
−190%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+267%
|
6−7
−267%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+278%
|
9−10
−278%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 40−45
+233%
|
12−14
−233%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+245%
|
20−22
−245%
|
| Hitman 3 | 27−30
+211%
|
9−10
−211%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 60−65
+173%
|
21−24
−173%
|
| Metro Exodus | 45−50
+488%
|
8−9
−488%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 40−45
+233%
|
12−14
−233%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 45−50
+200%
|
14−16
−200%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 45−50
+124%
|
21−24
−124%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 27−30
+155%
|
10−12
−155%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21−24
+475%
|
4−5
−475%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+327%
|
10−12
−327%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
+190%
|
10−11
−190%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+267%
|
6−7
−267%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+278%
|
9−10
−278%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 40−45
+233%
|
12−14
−233%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+245%
|
20−22
−245%
|
| Hitman 3 | 27−30
+211%
|
9−10
−211%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 60−65
+173%
|
21−24
−173%
|
| Metro Exodus | 45−50
+488%
|
8−9
−488%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 40−45
+233%
|
12−14
−233%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 45−50
+200%
|
14−16
−200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+190%
|
10−11
−190%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 45−50
+124%
|
21−24
−124%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 27−30
+155%
|
10−12
−155%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21−24
+475%
|
4−5
−475%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
+190%
|
10−11
−190%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+267%
|
6−7
−267%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+278%
|
9−10
−278%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+245%
|
20−22
−245%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 60−65
+173%
|
21−24
−173%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 45−50
+200%
|
14−16
−200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+190%
|
10−11
−190%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 45−50
+124%
|
21−24
−124%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 40−45
+233%
|
12−14
−233%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+250%
|
8−9
−250%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 24−27
+213%
|
8−9
−213%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 14−16
+250%
|
4−5
−250%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 10−12
+267%
|
3−4
−267%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 18−20
+200%
|
6−7
−200%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+250%
|
2−3
−250%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+360%
|
5−6
−360%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+460%
|
5−6
−460%
|
| Hitman 3 | 16−18
+88.9%
|
9−10
−88.9%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 27−30
+190%
|
10−11
−190%
|
| Metro Exodus | 24−27
+2400%
|
1−2
−2400%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 24−27
+225%
|
8−9
−225%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+275%
|
4−5
−275%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
+200%
|
8−9
−200%
|
4K
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 14−16
+367%
|
3−4
−367%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 10−12
+267%
|
3−4
−267%
|
| Hitman 3 | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
+117%
|
6−7
−117%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 7−8
+250%
|
2−3
−250%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 7−8
+250%
|
2−3
−250%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+533%
|
3−4
−533%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
+117%
|
6−7
−117%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
+1300%
|
1−2
−1300%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
+160%
|
5−6
−160%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 770M SLI is 2400% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, GTX 770M SLI surpassed UHD Graphics 750 in all 62 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.41 | 4.49 |
| Recency | 30 May 2013 | 30 March 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
GTX 770M SLI has a 220.9% higher aggregate performance score.
UHD Graphics 750, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.
The GeForce GTX 770M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 750 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
