Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI

Place in the ranking	394	377
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	5.88	14.67
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code name	no data	Vega Kaby Lake-G
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)	7 January 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	1280
Core clock speed	811 MHz	931 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1011 MHz
Number of transistors	2x 2540 Million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	65 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	2x 3 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	2x 192 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12_1
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 770M SLI 12.79

RX Vega M GL / 870 13.83
+8.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 770M SLI 9569

RX Vega M GL / 870 9862
+3.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	40−45 −10%	44 +10%
1440p	24−27 −16.7%	28 +16.7%
4K	12−14 −25%	15 +25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −9.1%	24−27 +9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −8%	27−30 +8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −7.1%	45−50 +7.1%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −9.1%	24−27 +9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −8%	27−30 +8%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −7.7%	55−60 +7.7%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 −9.1%	35−40 +9.1%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −25.7%	44 +25.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −50%	48 +50%
Valorant	50−55 +8.5%	47 −8.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −7.1%	45−50 +7.1%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −9.1%	24−27 +9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −8%	27−30 +8%
Dota 2	45−50 +70.4%	27 −70.4%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +32.4%	37 −32.4%
Fortnite	70−75 −6.8%	75−80 +6.8%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −7.7%	55−60 +7.7%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 −9.1%	35−40 +9.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	45−50 +12.2%	41 −12.2%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +16.7%	30 −16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 −35.8%	129 +35.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +100%	16 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −7.7%	40−45 +7.7%
Valorant	50−55 +70%	30 −70%
World of Tanks	170−180 −5.8%	180−190 +5.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −7.1%	45−50 +7.1%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −9.1%	24−27 +9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −8%	27−30 +8%
Dota 2	45−50 −8.7%	50−55 +8.7%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −4.1%	51 +4.1%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −7.7%	55−60 +7.7%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 −9.1%	35−40 +9.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 −6.3%	100−110 +6.3%
Valorant	50−55 −9.8%	55−60 +9.8%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	18−20 −11.1%	20−22 +11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −11.1%	20−22 +11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	85−90 +41.9%	62 −41.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%
World of Tanks	90−95 −7.8%	95−100 +7.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −12%	27−30 +12%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −6.7%	32 +6.7%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −9.7%	30−35 +9.7%
Forza Horizon 5	20−22 −5%	21−24 +5%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +0%	27 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%
Valorant	30−35 −6.3%	30−35 +6.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Dota 2	21−24 −26.1%	29 +26.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −26.1%	29 +26.1%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +23.3%	30 −23.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −26.1%	29 +26.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Dota 2	21−24 −8.7%	24−27 +8.7%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +6.7%	15 −6.7%
Fortnite	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −5.6%	18−20 +5.6%
Forza Horizon 5	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Valorant	12−14 −15.4%	14−16 +15.4%

This is how GTX 770M SLI and RX Vega M GL / 870 compete in popular games:

RX Vega M GL / 870 is 10% faster in 1080p
RX Vega M GL / 870 is 17% faster in 1440p
RX Vega M GL / 870 is 25% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 770M SLI is 100% faster.
in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega M GL / 870 is 50% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 770M SLI is ahead in 10 tests (16%)
RX Vega M GL / 870 is ahead in 50 tests (78%)
there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	12.79	13.83
Recency	30 May 2013	7 January 2018
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	65 Watt

RX Vega M GL / 870 has a 8.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 130.8% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 770M SLI and Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.