Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 750 Ti
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 60 Watt
10.10

Arc A370M outperforms GeForce GTX 750 Ti by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking411317
Place by popularity20not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.10no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Xe HPG (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGM107Alchemist
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 February 2014 (10 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data
Current price$357 (2.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6408
CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1020 MHz1550 MHz
Boost clock speed1085 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt50 Watt (35 - 50 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate43.4099.20
Floating-point performance1,389 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Arc A370M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length5.7" (14.5 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed5.4 GB/s14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+no data
3D Gaming+no data
3D Vision+no data
3D Vision Live+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 750 Ti 10.10
Arc A370M 15.79
+56.3%

Arc A370M outperforms GeForce GTX 750 Ti by 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 750 Ti 3903
Arc A370M 5115
+31.1%

Arc A370M outperforms GeForce GTX 750 Ti by 31% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 750 Ti 5378
Arc A370M 12090
+125%

Arc A370M outperforms GeForce GTX 750 Ti by 125% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 750 Ti 4294
Arc A370M 8149
+89.8%

Arc A370M outperforms GeForce GTX 750 Ti by 90% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 750 Ti 31349
Arc A370M 35604
+13.6%

Arc A370M outperforms GeForce GTX 750 Ti by 14% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD46
+21.1%
38
−21.1%
1440p12−14
−75%
21
+75%
4K21−24
−66.7%
35
+66.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−188%
46
+188%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−52.4%
30−35
+52.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−120%
33
+120%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−62.5%
50−55
+62.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−54.5%
30−35
+54.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−131%
37
+131%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−40%
40−45
+40%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−57.1%
40−45
+57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−51.4%
50−55
+51.4%
Hitman 3 21−24
−139%
55
+139%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−50%
50−55
+50%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−65.5%
45−50
+65.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−57.1%
40−45
+57.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−164%
74
+164%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−150%
45
+150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−52.4%
30−35
+52.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−33.3%
20
+33.3%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−62.5%
50−55
+62.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−54.5%
30−35
+54.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−56.3%
25
+56.3%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+25%
24
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−57.1%
40−45
+57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−51.4%
50−55
+51.4%
Hitman 3 21−24
−60.9%
35−40
+60.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−50%
50−55
+50%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−65.5%
45−50
+65.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−57.1%
40−45
+57.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−67.9%
47
+67.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−152%
53
+152%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−88.9%
34
+88.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−52.4%
30−35
+52.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−20%
18
+20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−54.5%
30−35
+54.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−31.3%
21
+31.3%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−40%
40−45
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−51.4%
50−55
+51.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−50%
50−55
+50%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−65.5%
45−50
+65.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−23.8%
26
+23.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+20%
15
−20%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−57.1%
40−45
+57.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−55%
30−35
+55%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Hitman 3 12−14
−76.9%
21−24
+76.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−117%
13
+117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−81.3%
29
+81.3%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−52.4%
30−35
+52.4%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−86.7%
27−30
+86.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−185%
37
+185%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−120%
11
+120%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 24−27
+9.1%
22
−9.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Hitman 3 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−54.5%
16−18
+54.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−87.5%
14−16
+87.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−54.5%
16−18
+54.5%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−50%
14−16
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%

This is how GTX 750 Ti and Arc A370M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 750 Ti is 21% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A370M is 75% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A370M is 67% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 750 Ti is 25% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A370M is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 750 Ti is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
  • Arc A370M is ahead in 69 tests (96%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.10 15.79
Recency 18 February 2014 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 50 Watt

The Arc A370M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 750 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a desktop card while Arc A370M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 5972 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 154 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.