Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Place in performance ranking	411	317
Place by popularity	20	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.10	no data
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Xe HPG (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GM107	Alchemist
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	18 February 2014 (10 years ago)	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	no data
Current price	$357 (2.4x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	8
CUDA cores	640	no data
Core clock speed	1020 MHz	1550 MHz
Boost clock speed	1085 MHz	1550 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	50 Watt (35 - 50 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	43.40	99.20
Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Arc A370M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	5.7" (14.5 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5.4 GB/s	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	86.4 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D	+	no data
3D Gaming	+	no data
3D Vision	+	no data
3D Vision Live	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 750 Ti 10.10

Arc A370M 15.79
+56.3%

Arc A370M outperforms GeForce GTX 750 Ti by 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 750 Ti 3903

Arc A370M 5115
+31.1%

Arc A370M outperforms GeForce GTX 750 Ti by 31% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 750 Ti 5378

Arc A370M 12090
+125%

Arc A370M outperforms GeForce GTX 750 Ti by 125% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 750 Ti 4294

Arc A370M 8149
+89.8%

Arc A370M outperforms GeForce GTX 750 Ti by 90% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 750 Ti 31349

Arc A370M 35604
+13.6%

Arc A370M outperforms GeForce GTX 750 Ti by 14% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	46 +21.1%	38 −21.1%
1440p	12−14 −75%	21 +75%
4K	21−24 −66.7%	35 +66.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

−188%

46
+188%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −52.4%	30−35 +52.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −120%	33 +120%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −62.5%	50−55 +62.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −54.5%	30−35 +54.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −131%	37 +131%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −40%	40−45 +40%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −57.1%	40−45 +57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −51.4%	50−55 +51.4%
Hitman 3	21−24 −139%	55 +139%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −50%	50−55 +50%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −65.5%	45−50 +65.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −57.1%	40−45 +57.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −164%	74 +164%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −150%	45 +150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −52.4%	30−35 +52.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −33.3%	20 +33.3%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −62.5%	50−55 +62.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −54.5%	30−35 +54.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −56.3%	25 +56.3%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +25%	24 −25%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −57.1%	40−45 +57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −51.4%	50−55 +51.4%
Hitman 3	21−24 −60.9%	35−40 +60.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −50%	50−55 +50%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −65.5%	45−50 +65.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −57.1%	40−45 +57.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −67.9%	47 +67.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −152%	53 +152%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −88.9%	34 +88.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −52.4%	30−35 +52.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −20%	18 +20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −54.5%	30−35 +54.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −31.3%	21 +31.3%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −40%	40−45 +40%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −51.4%	50−55 +51.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −50%	50−55 +50%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −65.5%	45−50 +65.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −23.8%	26 +23.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +20%	15 −20%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30

−57.1%

40−45
+57.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −55%	30−35 +55%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Hitman 3	12−14 −76.9%	21−24 +76.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −77.8%	16−18 +77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −117%	13 +117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −58.3%	18−20 +58.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −81.3%	29 +81.3%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −52.4%	30−35 +52.4%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −86.7%	27−30 +86.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −185%	37 +185%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −70%	16−18 +70%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −120%	11 +120%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	24−27 +9.1%	22 −9.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −77.8%	16−18 +77.8%
Hitman 3	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −54.5%	16−18 +54.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −87.5%	14−16 +87.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Battlefield 5	8−9 −113%	16−18 +113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −61.5%	21−24 +61.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −54.5%	16−18 +54.5%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −50%	14−16 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

−40%

14−16
+40%

This is how GTX 750 Ti and Arc A370M compete in popular games:

GTX 750 Ti is 21% faster in 1080p
Arc A370M is 75% faster in 1440p
Arc A370M is 67% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 750 Ti is 25% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A370M is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games: